2012 International Conference on Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iccitechnol.2012.6285796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A frame aggregation scheduler for QoS-sensitive applications in IEEE 802.11n WLANs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) When the size of aggregated frame is raised, the delay is considerably increased because of the time added when waiting for other packets in the queue to construct the A-MPDU frame. This was proved by authors in [19,35,37,38]. Particularly, for low rate applications such as VoIP, the required delay to fill the aggregated frame will be increased.…”
Section: [33]mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(ii) When the size of aggregated frame is raised, the delay is considerably increased because of the time added when waiting for other packets in the queue to construct the A-MPDU frame. This was proved by authors in [19,35,37,38]. Particularly, for low rate applications such as VoIP, the required delay to fill the aggregated frame will be increased.…”
Section: [33]mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This was the case of proposed schedulers in . Schedulers based on deadline packet transmission improve network performance by reducing packet rejection, as it was proposed by Majeed and Abu‐Ghazaleh . Schedulers that consider QoS requirements of different applications are the most appropriate for multimedia applications. This was the case of scheduler elaborated by . In fact, considering access network delay threshold, average access delay and waiting time, delay and throughput are improved for all traffic types.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lastly, the capacity of every subframe confines to 4095 bytes due to the inability of PPDU length in surpassing the pre-determined time threshold at 5.46 ms. This can obtained by dividing the maximum length with the lowest PHY value (Skordoulis et al, 2008;Hajlaoui et al, 2012).…”
Section: A-mpdu Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%