2003
DOI: 10.1108/10662240310501612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework and methodology for evaluating e‐commerce Web sites

Abstract: The corporate Web site is an indispensable part of any e‐commerce venture. If users find it difficult to do electronic transactions, they will visit another online source, or go to a physical source instead. Evaluating the performance of e‐commerce Web sites has received some attention in the past few years, but there is still a pressing need for a more comprehensive approach. This paper attempts to address this need by providing an e‐commerce Web site evaluation framework and method built on solid business pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined-approach studies Szymanski and Hise [85] 139 Survey Liu and Arnett [53] 125 Survey Palmer [64] 116 Survey Devaraj et al [22] 92 Survey Srinivasan et al [83] 78 Survey Wolfinbarger and Gilly [93] 71 Survey Barnes and Vidgen [5] 39 Survey Harris and Goode [34] 37 Survey Evans et al [28] 28 Case study Roy et al [76] 23 Experiment Okazaki and Rivas [62] 19 Content analysis Li et al [48] 17 Survey Cao et al [18] 16 Experiment Wan [91] 16 Content analysis van der Merwe et al [88] 15 Concept development. Barnes and Vidgen [6] 15…”
Section: General Trend Of the Reviewed Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combined-approach studies Szymanski and Hise [85] 139 Survey Liu and Arnett [53] 125 Survey Palmer [64] 116 Survey Devaraj et al [22] 92 Survey Srinivasan et al [83] 78 Survey Wolfinbarger and Gilly [93] 71 Survey Barnes and Vidgen [5] 39 Survey Harris and Goode [34] 37 Survey Evans et al [28] 28 Case study Roy et al [76] 23 Experiment Okazaki and Rivas [62] 19 Content analysis Li et al [48] 17 Survey Cao et al [18] 16 Experiment Wan [91] 16 Content analysis van der Merwe et al [88] 15 Concept development. Barnes and Vidgen [6] 15…”
Section: General Trend Of the Reviewed Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case study Kim and Stoel [42] 12 Survey Marsico and Levialdi [56] 12 Experiment Kuo [45] 12 Survey Gonzá lez and Palacios [30] 11 Content analysis Bhatt [12] 8 Experiment Chakraborty et al [15] 8 Survey Evanschitzky et al [29] 8 Survey Kim et al [43] 7 Survey Shchiglik and Barnes [78] 7 Survey Supphellen and Nysveen [85] 7 Survey Van Iwaarden et al [88] 7 Survey Wulf et al [95] 5 Survey Cheung and Huang [16] 5 Content analysis Baloglu and Pekcan [4] 5 Content analysis Singh and Matsuo [80] 4 Content analysis Blake et al [13] 3 Survey Song and Zahedi [82] 2 Experiment Petre et al [68] 2 Experiment Zviran et al [100] 2 Survey Ellinger et al [26] 2 Content analysis Singh and Baack [80] 1 Content analysis Barnes and Vidgen [7] 1 Case study Ethier et al [27] 1 Experiment available and to determine their appropriate framework. Table 3 presents the IS, marketing, and combined-approach studies included in our review.…”
Section: General Trend Of the Reviewed Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical methods are the most widely used assessment tools. 15,17,24,[28][29][30] Additionally, other methods such as multidimensional scaling and correspondence analysis, 31 weighted scores, 32 simulation, 33 the index method, 34 and soft computing technologies 35 are also used in assessing and improving Web site quality. To identify the important dimensions influencing the e-learners' assessment of e-learning Web sites, three-stage research is conducted: an in-depth analysis of the related literature, a survey among e-learners, and the collection/ combination of sector experts' experiences.…”
Section: Quality Evaluation Of E-learning Web Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,50]. Second, while it is usually difficult to quantify many general measures of design principles or web-site evaluation frameworks for the automated evaluation of customer aid functions [11,20,54], this approach enables the simulated analysis of customer aid functions using direct measures of effectiveness and efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%