2002
DOI: 10.1177/107179190200900203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework Exploring the Effects of the Machiavellian Disposition on the Relationship Between Motivation and Influence Tactics

Abstract: The relationship between sources of motivation and influence tactics and the moderating effect of the Machiavellian disposition are explored in this review of the literature in the areas of influence tactics, Machiavellian personality, and human motivation to develop the proposed framework(s). Propositions are developed linking motivation sources, influence tactics, and Machiavellian personality. Implications for research and practice also are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, based on the results of Study 1, where those high versus low in Machiavellianism exhibit lower ToM skills, and from Study 2, where those high versus low in Machiavellianism are more sensitive to affective content communicated subtly by others, especially negative affect, we predict that those high versus low in Machiavellianism will conduct more OCB-Os because their relative disadvantage in ToM skills should not be a factor; whereas their relative advantage in emotional resonance should make them sensitive to expectations of supervisors conveyed affectively and thus more likely to commit OCB-Os, which are more visible than OCB-Is to managers. Moreover, Machiavellians are known to be high in the use of ingratiation and impression management tactics, which participation in OCB-Os should engender and facilitate (e.g., Bolino & Turnley, 2003;liden & Mitchell, 1988;Reimers & Barbuto, 2002;Zin et al, 2011). likewise, OCB-Os are especially under control of extrinsic motivation, to which Machiavellians seem especially prone (e.g., Deci & Ryan, 2009).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, based on the results of Study 1, where those high versus low in Machiavellianism exhibit lower ToM skills, and from Study 2, where those high versus low in Machiavellianism are more sensitive to affective content communicated subtly by others, especially negative affect, we predict that those high versus low in Machiavellianism will conduct more OCB-Os because their relative disadvantage in ToM skills should not be a factor; whereas their relative advantage in emotional resonance should make them sensitive to expectations of supervisors conveyed affectively and thus more likely to commit OCB-Os, which are more visible than OCB-Is to managers. Moreover, Machiavellians are known to be high in the use of ingratiation and impression management tactics, which participation in OCB-Os should engender and facilitate (e.g., Bolino & Turnley, 2003;liden & Mitchell, 1988;Reimers & Barbuto, 2002;Zin et al, 2011). likewise, OCB-Os are especially under control of extrinsic motivation, to which Machiavellians seem especially prone (e.g., Deci & Ryan, 2009).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars have reported high Machiavellians as being particularly goal oriented: motivated to succeed (Reimers and Barbuto, 2002), showing a strong commitment to self-set goals (Huber and Neale, 1986), and willing to use their influence over others to achieve their goals (Lau and Shaffer, 1999).…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a few empirical findings concluded that Machiavellianism is a strong predictor of incivility (Furtner, Maran, & Rauthmann, 2017), poor job performance (Blickle, Schütte, & Genau, 2018), counterproductive work behaviors (Cohen, 2018), and workplace bullying (Pilch & Turska, 2015). It has already been tested as a moderator between various organizationally desired relationships in different settings (Reimers & Barbuto, 2002;Wei & Chen, 2012;Zagenczyk et al, 2013). Machs, being self-promoting in nature, disregard any contribution from either an individual, group, or organization.…”
Section: A Machiavellian As Moderator Between Hpwps and Popmentioning
confidence: 99%