2007
DOI: 10.1093/ietcom/e90-b.4.742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for an Integrated Co-allocator for Data Grid in Multi-Sender Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic co-allocation with duplicate assignments (DCDA) The co-allocation strategies described above do not handle the shortcoming of faster servers having to wait for the slowest server to deliver its final block which, in most cases, wastes much time and decreases overall performance. Neither the prediction nor the heuristic approach, the DCDA scheme dynamically co-allocates duplicate assignments (Bhuvaneswaran et al, 2005(Bhuvaneswaran et al, , 2007 and copies nicely with changes in server speed performance, as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Aggressive Load Balancingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dynamic co-allocation with duplicate assignments (DCDA) The co-allocation strategies described above do not handle the shortcoming of faster servers having to wait for the slowest server to deliver its final block which, in most cases, wastes much time and decreases overall performance. Neither the prediction nor the heuristic approach, the DCDA scheme dynamically co-allocates duplicate assignments (Bhuvaneswaran et al, 2005(Bhuvaneswaran et al, , 2007 and copies nicely with changes in server speed performance, as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Aggressive Load Balancingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dynamic approaches proposed in literature, such as the one based on duplicate assignment [5] and the recursiveadjustment co-allocation algorithm [23], do not estimate a priori the time needed for the overall content delivery and do not take into account the costs of resources usage. In [13] a performance and cost-based mechanisms to select the servers for parallel file transfer is presented.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interval time required by RS i to transfer the assigned chunks n i , called T i , is: (4) states that the aggregate incoming throughput R par , resulting by the parallel transfer flows from each RS i averaged over the overall content transfer time T, must not exceed R a . Constraint (5) ensures that the maximum latency is not overcome. Finally, constraint (6) states that n i must be a positive integer, because of the necessity to partition a content in an integer number of chunks, whose size has to be not too large, for granting a fine striping granularity, and not too small, for limiting protocol overheads.…”
Section: Routing and Parallel Updating Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Dynamic Co-allocation with Duplicate Assignments (DCDA) [16,17]: Neither prediction nor heuristics approaches, the DCDA scheme dynamically co-allocates duplicate assignments and copes nicely with changes in server speed performance.…”
Section: Co-allocation Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%