2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bibm.2017.8217914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for analyzing DNA methylation data from Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip

Abstract: Background: DNA methylation has been identified to be widely associated to complex diseases. Among biological platforms to profile DNA methylation in human, the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (450K) has been accepted as one of the most efficient technologies. However, challenges exist in analysis of DNA methylation data generated by this technology due to widespread biases. Results: Here we proposed a generalized framework for evaluating data analysis methods for Illumina 450K array. This frame… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, both the 450K and EPIC arrays contain two different types of probes with different dynamic ranges [112]. Several methods have been developed to minimize bias introduced by these potential array effects [113][114][115][116], as well as comparisons across methods, which provide useful frameworks for the design of quality control and normalization of Illumina-based DNA methylation profiles [117][118][119]. Further work has also focused on guidelines for exclusion criteria of low-performing probes [120][121][122], or has explicitly flagged unreliable probes due to cross-reactive events or underlying genetic variation [123].…”
Section: Dna Methylation Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, both the 450K and EPIC arrays contain two different types of probes with different dynamic ranges [112]. Several methods have been developed to minimize bias introduced by these potential array effects [113][114][115][116], as well as comparisons across methods, which provide useful frameworks for the design of quality control and normalization of Illumina-based DNA methylation profiles [117][118][119]. Further work has also focused on guidelines for exclusion criteria of low-performing probes [120][121][122], or has explicitly flagged unreliable probes due to cross-reactive events or underlying genetic variation [123].…”
Section: Dna Methylation Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to DNAm derived from targeted methods such as bisulfite pyrosequencing, DNAm from array‐based methods requires rigorous quality control, background correction and signal normalization (Morris & Beck, 2015; Wang, Wu, & Wang, 2018). There are numerous programming tools and pipelines for carrying these procedures out, but quality control and normalization should be modified when output will be used for epigenetic clocks.…”
Section: Methods and Implementation Of Epigenetic Clocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA‐seq data and latest follow‐up information were downloaded from TCGA GDC Application Programming Interface, which included a total of 185 samples. In addition, Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 data were downloaded from the UCSC Cancer Browser (Z. Wang, Wu, & Wang, 2018), which included 202 samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%