2012
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2011.2171493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Automatic and Unsupervised Detection of Multiple Changes in Multitemporal Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
129
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ELM resulted in the estimated number of Mopt equal to 13. By analyzing all obtained values in different considered approaches, we can briefly conclude that in this case, a reliable Mopt value for generating a comparable result with the baseline might be in the range of [8,13], and a higher Mopt value (e.g., [22,33]) might lead to higher CD performance. The evaluation of computational efficiency in the two proposed supervised approaches, i.e., SVM-based and RaF-based, in comparison with HSCVA and S 2 CVA, the two reference methods, is provided as shown in .…”
Section: Number Of Selected Bands (M) Estimated Number Of Changes (K)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ELM resulted in the estimated number of Mopt equal to 13. By analyzing all obtained values in different considered approaches, we can briefly conclude that in this case, a reliable Mopt value for generating a comparable result with the baseline might be in the range of [8,13], and a higher Mopt value (e.g., [22,33]) might lead to higher CD performance. The evaluation of computational efficiency in the two proposed supervised approaches, i.e., SVM-based and RaF-based, in comparison with HSCVA and S 2 CVA, the two reference methods, is provided as shown in .…”
Section: Number Of Selected Bands (M) Estimated Number Of Changes (K)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of the lack of observed data on the changed objects and the subjective interference of supervised threshold determination, we used the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm [22,32] to define thresholds in an unsupervised way. This method has been widely used for change threshold determination [11,28,33]. Thus, changed objects are extracted based on threshold segmentation of the CVA magnitude image.…”
Section: Extraction Of Changed Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, when two thematic maps (e.g., LC/LU or habitats maps) independently produced at time T 1 and time T 2 are available, the well-known Post Classification Comparison (PCC) approach [10][11][12][13][14] can be used. The degree of success of this technique depends upon the reliability of the input thematic maps [15,16] since the quality of the output change image is related to the product of the accuracies of the two maps being compared.…”
Section: Change Detection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%