2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for blind modal identification using joint approximate diagonalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
124
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One recent and elegant solution consists of viewing the modal expansion of a set of structural responses as a mixture of modal coordinates -the "source signals" -where the mode shapes fill the columns of a mixing matrix. Then, under quite mild assumptions concerning only the mutual independence of the sources, it is possible to identify all constituents of the mixture up to an arbitrary scaling of the mode shapes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In turn, standard single-degreeof-freedom techniques can be applied on the separated modal coordinates to identify the global modal parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One recent and elegant solution consists of viewing the modal expansion of a set of structural responses as a mixture of modal coordinates -the "source signals" -where the mode shapes fill the columns of a mixing matrix. Then, under quite mild assumptions concerning only the mutual independence of the sources, it is possible to identify all constituents of the mixture up to an arbitrary scaling of the mode shapes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In turn, standard single-degreeof-freedom techniques can be applied on the separated modal coordinates to identify the global modal parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state-ofthe-art in the context of operational modal analysis is rooted on the so-called Second-Order Blind Identification (SOBI) algorithm, which has proven extremely robust: its principle consists in separating sources -i.e. modal coordinates -which are least mutually correlated at several time-lags [4,[6][7][8][9]20]. This was shown to work surprisingly well, even though the assumption of mutual decorrelation of modes is not truly fulfilled as soon as the system is non-conservative (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recently established [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] that there is a one-to-one mapping between the modal superposition model and the linear mixture model of the blind source separation (BSS), which can perform output-only modal identification efficiently. Among a family of BSS techniques that are suited for output-only modal identification, the complexity pursuit (CP) algorithm [36] was shown to be efficient and able to identify closely-spaced and highly-damped modes with little expert supervision and parameter adjustments; it is therefore adopted in this study.…”
Section: Blind Mode Separation Of Principal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data augmentation via windowing and Hilbert transforms have been shown to improve estimated modal responses [26]. Variants of the SOBI method have been developed in order to enhance the results for the identification of earthquake-excited structures [27], underdetermined structural cases [28], and cases with narrow band excitation [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%