2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for characterising and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental modelling

Abstract: Environmental modelling is transitioning from the traditional paradigm that focuses on the model and its quantitative performance to a more holistic paradigm that recognises successful model-based outcomes are closely tied to undertaking modelling as a social process, not just as a technical procedure. This paper redefines evaluation as a multi-dimensional and multi-perspective concept, and proposes a more complete framework for identifying and measuring the effectiveness of modelling that serves the new parad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
112
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(156 reference statements)
0
112
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these conceptual guidelines, it remains challenging for modelers to understand, from the outset, how modeling outputs can and will be used in practice. As stated by Hamilton et al (: 21), “water resource models are an obvious way for [scientists and decision‐makers] to work together, but uneven power relations and the institutional differences between academic and public sector employment can stymie their role in mediating interests of the two groups.” In this context, our research seeks to understand the role that hydrologic modeling (and coupled monitoring) can play in supporting real‐world watershed management programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these conceptual guidelines, it remains challenging for modelers to understand, from the outset, how modeling outputs can and will be used in practice. As stated by Hamilton et al (: 21), “water resource models are an obvious way for [scientists and decision‐makers] to work together, but uneven power relations and the institutional differences between academic and public sector employment can stymie their role in mediating interests of the two groups.” In this context, our research seeks to understand the role that hydrologic modeling (and coupled monitoring) can play in supporting real‐world watershed management programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evaluation extends beyond the technical performance of the SoS model ( Bennett et al, 2013 ) to consider outcomes of modeling as a social process. Success of a model depends on the beliefs and expectations of the intended users and in their satisfaction with the model and its results ( Hamilton et al, 2019 ). It may also depend on the biases and beliefs of the model creators ( Glynn et al, 2017 ) and in an alignment of expectations between creators and users ( Sterling et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Scale Issues To Considermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also depend on the biases and beliefs of the model creators ( Glynn et al, 2017 ) and in an alignment of expectations between creators and users ( Sterling et al, 2019 ). The suitability of the success criteria is dependent on the context of the project, including not only the model purpose, but also the characteristics of the problem, such as its complexity and the resources that were available ( Hamilton et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Scale Issues To Considermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data products prepared and validated by experts can help in building confidence in the analysis results. With reference to the evaluation framework for environmental modelling developed by Hamilton et al (2019), avoiding rushed modelling by inexperienced modellers can improve the confidence in several project-level elements of that framework -1) efficiency by reducing time needed to produce estimates, 2) credibility by using outputs from professional hydrologists, 3)…”
Section: Planned Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a model evaluation framework (e.g. Hamilton et al 2019), an https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-276 Preprint. Discussion started: 26 October 2020 c Author(s) 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%