2010
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2010.530866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for decentralised feedback connectivity control with application to sensor networks

Abstract: P r e p r i n t 2 8 t h M a y 2 0 1 0 --1 5 : 3 6 In this paper we propose a decentralised algorithm for connectivity maintenance in a distributed sensor network. Our algorithm uses the dynamics of a consensus algorithm to estimate the connectivity of a network topology in a decentralised manner. These estimates are then used to inform a decentralised control algorithm that regulates the network connectivity to some desired level. Under certain realistic assumptions we show the closed loop dynamics can be desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of this paper and the topology control problem discussed in [6], we are interested in the following type of n-dimensional positive systems with an input term:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the context of this paper and the topology control problem discussed in [6], we are interested in the following type of n-dimensional positive systems with an input term:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also allows us to determine how the control gain η must be chosen so that the closed loop system is stable, which is reported in depth in [6]. Note again, that any other consensus scheme (to which Theorem 2 can be applied) may be used as well.…”
Section: Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the Fiedler value is a nondifferentiable function of the Laplacian matrix, which presents difficulties in designing feedback controllers to maintain it positive definite. Ways to overcome this problem involve either positive definiteness constraints on the determinant of the Laplacian matrix that is a differentiable function of the Laplacian [43], or distributed consensus on either Laplacian eigenvectors [44], [45] or on the network structure itself [46] for local estimation of the Fiedler value of the overall network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%