2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for empirical applications of production theory without expected utility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the convexity hypothesis is not rejected by the data, we conclude that the model estimate is, indeed, consistent with expected utility maximisation theory. A similar conclusion is reached in Satyanarayan (1999) and Appelbaum (2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the convexity hypothesis is not rejected by the data, we conclude that the model estimate is, indeed, consistent with expected utility maximisation theory. A similar conclusion is reached in Satyanarayan (1999) and Appelbaum (2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…First, unlike Chavas and Holt (1996), for example, we do not specify functional forms for either the utility function or the production technology. Rather, we follow the approach outlined in Appelbaum (1993), Appelbaum and Ullah (1997), Satyanarayan (1999) and Appelbaum (2006) 3 and apply a dual approach to derive supply and demand functions. Specifically, we specify a quadratic approximation to the indirect utility function to obtain a set of empirically estimable supply/demand functions expressed in terms of the first two moments of the price distribution (and other exogenous variables).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to estimate the relative change to price relative to consumption based on previous studies of price elasticity for the relevant products. For example, using US furniture data Appelbaum (2006) found inelastic material substitution, suggesting that wood materials in finished products are not easily substituted and thus restrictions in supply will lead to higher prices. While this is only a single study, it reflects a broader truth about price behavior following restrictions in the supply of wood available due to the removal of low price illegal timber from the market.…”
Section: Support In Supplier Countries: Indonesia and Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Machina (1984), where it is shown that, in the case of expected utility (in the context of a static model), convexity and continuity in the distribution completely characterize the indirect utility functional, so that any functional with these properties is the indirect utility functional for some preferences. 13 See Appelbaum (1997Appelbaum ( , 2006 for a discussion and proof of continuity, convexity and monotonicity. If we do not have expected utility, H (w t , R f t , m t ) may be either convex, or concave in the moments.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See for example, Kocherlakota and Pistaferri (2007) and Basu et al (2008). 6 The application of duality and the use of the indirect utility function are based on Appelbaum (1997Appelbaum ( , 2006 where it is developed in a static production decisions framework. of the IUF in mean/standard deviation space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%