2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities

Abstract: Integration of genomic technology into healthcare settings establishes new capabilities to predict disease susceptibility and optimize treatment regimes. Yet, Indigenous peoples remain starkly underrepresented in genetic and clinical health research and are unlikely to benefit from such efforts. To foster collaboration with Indigenous communities, we propose six principles for ethical engagement in genomic research: understand existing regulations, foster collaboration, build cultural competency, improve resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
271
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
271
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First is addressing the sampling bias in large human genetics studies; most human genetics studies focus on present‐day peoples in western European countries and the U.S., which has long been criticized by the biological anthropological community (Reardon & TallBear, ). Fortunately, the limitations of this bias have been increasingly appreciated (Bolnick, Raff, Springs, Reynolds, & Miró‐Herrans, ; Claw et al, ; Gokcumen, ). For example, extensive sampling of present‐day populations that live in Papua New Guinea revealed previously hidden and surprisingly recent introgression from Denisovans into the ancestors of these populations (Jacobs et al, ).…”
Section: An Exciting Tomorrow and A Whole Lot Of Gaps To Fillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First is addressing the sampling bias in large human genetics studies; most human genetics studies focus on present‐day peoples in western European countries and the U.S., which has long been criticized by the biological anthropological community (Reardon & TallBear, ). Fortunately, the limitations of this bias have been increasingly appreciated (Bolnick, Raff, Springs, Reynolds, & Miró‐Herrans, ; Claw et al, ; Gokcumen, ). For example, extensive sampling of present‐day populations that live in Papua New Guinea revealed previously hidden and surprisingly recent introgression from Denisovans into the ancestors of these populations (Jacobs et al, ).…”
Section: An Exciting Tomorrow and A Whole Lot Of Gaps To Fillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited community involvement typical of most data repositories is insufficient to address Indigenous concerns about research oversight. 27 Although some guidance around conducting genetic research with tribes has been developed, 28,29 there is an important need to generate stronger guidance and policy language to ensure more comprehensive controls over data derived from Indigenous peoples and support productive partnerships with researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide-scale public participation in genetic-based research enables investigators to cultivate databases that capture genetic diversity from a broad range of populations, thereby facilitating the development of effective individualized therapies for people of all racial and ethnic backgrounds (Sirugo, Williams, & Tishkoff, 2019). However, there is a consistent underrepresentation of individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States in genetic research (Claw et al, 2018;Need & Goldstein, 2009;Popejoy & Fullerton, 2016). A 2009 analysis reported that 96% of genetic studies were conducted on populations of European descent (terminology defined by authors; Need & Goldstein, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%