2000
DOI: 10.1080/095119200130054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for estimating manufacturing cost from geometric design data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the increasing complexity of the methods is the increased level of detail used to determine the manufacturing cost of a product as well as the accuracy of the calculation. In essence, product cost estimation attempts to realistically predict the costs required to manufacture a specific product before it is actually created (Wei & Egbelu, 2000;Jha, 1992).…”
Section: Challenges Of Product Cost Estimation In Die Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for the increasing complexity of the methods is the increased level of detail used to determine the manufacturing cost of a product as well as the accuracy of the calculation. In essence, product cost estimation attempts to realistically predict the costs required to manufacture a specific product before it is actually created (Wei & Egbelu, 2000;Jha, 1992).…”
Section: Challenges Of Product Cost Estimation In Die Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, feature-based methods break down the analysed part into standard sections, referred to as features and, based on their geometry, the volume of the material to be removed is determined, which when put together with the properties of the machine used reveals the needed processing time. Further, the cost estimate is an aggregate of the individual processing costs, in a similar manner as with the activity-based approaches (Shehab & Abdalla, 2001;Weustink, et al, 2000;Bouaziz, et al, 2004;Bouaziz, et al, 2006;Chin & Wong, 1995;Wei & Egbelu, 2000;Ben-Arieh, 2000;Ou-Yang & Lin, 1997;Nagahanumaiah, et al, 2005;Jung, 2002).…”
Section: Generative Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Wei and Egbelu's research, they arranged the possible process orders from the shape data of the machine processing products, and among these, they presented every possible process order expressing the process order that can minimize the machine processing cost using the tree structure composed of AND/OR, and calculated the processing cost according to each process plan using the cutting volume in each process, but the calculating method for material cost or labor cost was not taken into consider (Wei & Egbelu, 2000). Like the previous researches above, analogy-Based techniques have difficulties of measuring the degree of similarity between a new product and an existing product, and reflecting the technical change factors.…”
Section: Study Of Previous Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T ij ϭ k j n kϭ1 p ijk (2) where, T ij ϭ time required to accomplish the machining operation j of feature i k j ϭ coefficient for the operation j p ijk ϭ value of a parameter or the reciprocal of a parameter used in defining feature i 2. Computation of the required machining cost for each operation.…”
Section: Algorithmic Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei and Egbelu [2] developed a framework to estimate the lowest product manufacturing cost from the AND/OR tree representation of an alternative process. A major drawback of their framework was that it focused only on processing and material handling costs without considering other direct product costs such as set-up, material, fixtures, and labour cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%