A Framework for Experimenting Co-creation in Real-Life Contexts

Real, Marion; Schmittinger, Felicitas

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78733-2_2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While there has been important progress in the development of frameworks with principles and intended learning outcomes for RRI (Burget et al., 2017; Heras & Ruiz‐Mallén, 2017; PROSO Consortium, 2018), there are few studies that link those frameworks to engagement strategies and practices or that provide a rigorous examination of participant learning outcomes (Bauer et al., 2021; Real & Schmittinger, 2022; Rowe & Frewer, 2004; but see Fraaije et al., 2022). Evaluation of RRI engagement efforts tends to focus on the challenges of uniting organizations and efforts toward RRI goals (D'Arcy & Mariani, 2022; Rizzo & Deserti, 2022; Vermeulen et al., 2016), reflecting the field's early stage of development (Köppchen, 2022; Krabbenborg & Mulder, 2015; van der Windt et al., 2014).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Responsible Research and Innovation in Museums Through Hands‐on Activities

Ostman

Nagy

Mawasi

et al. 2022

Curator The Museum Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responsible research and innovation (RRI) is a framework for thinking about the implications of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) discoveries and innovations and shaping them in a way that is responsible to people, future generations, and the natural environment. In this paper, we present a project that engages museum visitors in learning about RRI through hands-on activities inspired by Mary Shelley's Frankenstein story, characters, and themes. We developed a learning framework describing strategies and outcomes for RRI in informal educational settings, then created a set of seven activities that embodied the framework and studied their implementation at 13 museums. Evidence from observations and interviews are consistent with the RRI learning framework and suggest a number of practical implications for its use in museums.The struggles of Victor Frankenstein and his creature still resonate 200 years after the publication of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (Shelley, 2018). The characters and key themes of the Frankenstein story are familiar, especially the fatal consequences of prioritizing personal ambition and scientific discovery over responsibility and ethics (Halpern et al., 2016;Hitchcock, 2007;Lederer, 2002). The emerging technologies of today-from artificial intelligence to genetic engineering-raise the same questions and dilemmas that came to Shelley's mind as she

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Responsible Research and Innovation in Museums Through Hands‐on Activities

Ostman

Nagy

Mawasi

et al. 2022

Curator The Museum Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A co-design exemplar: how to align with community goals when developing data collection methods with communities from refugee backgrounds

Gingell,

Murray,

Correa-Velez

et al. 2024

Research for All

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Co-design in a research context is an approach that involves participants reflecting on their lived experience of a phenomenon to tailor research outcomes to their needs. It is empowering because it provides greater equity in the research process. However, minimal literature is available on ways to encompass co-design into research planning. This article aims to provide an exemplar of co-design research by describing how data collection methods and tools were developed in a participatory action research project through collaboration with community members with a lived refugee experience in Greater Brisbane, Australia. Eight people (aged 18 to 65) were recruited using convenience and purposive sampling, with four workshops held between January and April 2022. Workshops utilised co-design methods, including journey mapping, personas, brainstorming and experiential learning to capture the lived experience of accessing food, to collaboratively co-design data collection methods and tools, and to train community members as community researchers. Co-designing data collection methods ensured that community members with no research experience could contribute towards the design of culturally appropriate data collection tools. Future research in public health should embed co-design into research/intervention planning, execution and outcomes, and align research goals with community goals by drawing on lived experience.

show abstract

A Framework for Experimenting Co-creation in Real-Life Contexts

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Exploring Responsible Research and Innovation in Museums Through Hands‐on Activities

Exploring Responsible Research and Innovation in Museums Through Hands‐on Activities

A co-design exemplar: how to align with community goals when developing data collection methods with communities from refugee backgrounds

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About