2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for facilitating video-mediated reflection: Supporting preservice teachers as they create ‘warranted assertabilities’ about literacy teaching and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
13

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study have indicated that reflection is content specific (Gelfuso, 2016) in that the reflective practitioner need time, knowledge, and experience to develop their professional understanding in teaching. The present study has revealed that the participants' level of reflectivity is mostly within the range of dialogic reflection (Level 3 and Level 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The findings of this study have indicated that reflection is content specific (Gelfuso, 2016) in that the reflective practitioner need time, knowledge, and experience to develop their professional understanding in teaching. The present study has revealed that the participants' level of reflectivity is mostly within the range of dialogic reflection (Level 3 and Level 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…All of the groups of teachers who underwent transformation in our project experienced a phenomenon known as dissonance (Delaney, 2015;Gelfuso, 2016) or friction (Bakkenes, Vermunt, & Wubbels, 2010;Ward, Nolena, & Horn, 2011). Dissonance describes a situation in which there is a discrepancy between what is expected or wanted and what is true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They claimed that without conflicts that result in productive friction being experienced and reconciled, no lasting change is possible in the teaching profession. According to Gelfuso (2016), experiencing dissonance is closely connected with reflection. Therefore, dissonance is not only recognized in the process of reflection but also enables the process of reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este sentido, convenimos en que dejar fluir la reflexión a partir de las preocupaciones que los estudiantes traían a la clase o taller era necesario para dotar de significado el trabajo y no coartar el análisis. Para ello se requería elaborar buenas preguntas que actuaran como gatilladoras o generadoras de conflicto para profundizar el análisis (Gelfuso, 2016). De esta forma, el mayor desafío se instala en poder equilibrar mejor un estilo de conducción: más abierto en el inicio de la discusión, para favorecer que emerjan las problemáticas de interés y más directivo hacia el final, para hacer converger las voces participantes (Liu, 2017).…”
Section: Algunas Reflexiones Finalesunclassified