2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4659951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Formal Analysis of Anonymous Communication Protocols

Abstract: Anonymity is the property of keeping secret the identity of the user performing a certain action. The need for anonymity may arise in a wide range of situations, like electronic voting, Web browsing, and so on. In order to verify the anonymity of security protocols, a framework for formal analysis of anonymous communication protocols is proposed. In this framework, we define operational semantics for security protocols using a labelled transition system; the transition relation is defined by the transition rul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al [21] presented a labeled transition framework to offer operational semantics for security protocols; the transition relation was specified by the transition rules, including the create, transmit, and receive rules. A formal explanation of the invader model in this framework is also provided.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al [21] presented a labeled transition framework to offer operational semantics for security protocols; the transition relation was specified by the transition rules, including the create, transmit, and receive rules. A formal explanation of the invader model in this framework is also provided.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 presents the comparison of the references from the literature survey for their research features. X X Al-Garadi et al [15] X X X Zhou et al [17] X X X Verma et al [14] X X Wang et al [20] X X Bharany et al [23] X X X Yahuza et al [27] X X Paredes et al [29] X X X Yang et al [21] X X X Yin et al [22] Kaur et al [24] X X Bharany et al [26] X X Bharany et al [28] X X X Bharany et al [30] X X X Shuaib et al [31] X X X…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%