2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-017-1838-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Imperfectly Observed Networks

Abstract: Model a network as an edge-weighted graph, where the (unknown) weight w e of edge e indicates the frequency of observed interactions, and over time t we observe a Poisson(tw e ) number of interactions across edges e. How should we estimate some given statistic of the underlying network? This leads to wide-ranging and challenging problems, on which this article makes only partial progress.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…we clearly have a(S) ≤ κb(S); note this is where we use the monotonicity hypothesis (3). The result now follows from (6,8).…”
Section: A Monotonicity Conditionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…we clearly have a(S) ≤ κb(S); note this is where we use the monotonicity hypothesis (3). The result now follows from (6,8).…”
Section: A Monotonicity Conditionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Setting κ = max{h(S) − h(S ′ ) : S → S ′ a possible transition} we clearly have a(S) ≤ κb(S); note this is where we use the monotonicity hypothesis (3). The result now follows from (6,8).…”
Section: A Monotonicity Conditionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A technically more complicated application of that bound to first passage percolation on general weighted graphs, plus other simple applications, can be found in [2]. "Big picture" discussions of various random processes over finite edge-weighted graphs can be found in [1] and [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%