2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1218-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for including enhanced exposure to naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in LCA

Abstract: Purpose Despite advances in the development of impact categories for ionising radiation, the focus on artificial radionuclides produced in the nuclear fuel cycle means that the potential impacts resulting from increased exposure to naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) are still only covered to a limited degree in life cycle assessment (LCA). Here, we present a potential framework for the inclusion of the exposure routes and impact pathways particular to NORM in LCA. Methods We assess the potential … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LCIA characterisation models for enhanced exposure to NORM were developed according to the framework set out in Joyce et al (2016). This implementation is described in section 3 below, and is available as an Excel file in the online supplementary materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…LCIA characterisation models for enhanced exposure to NORM were developed according to the framework set out in Joyce et al (2016). This implementation is described in section 3 below, and is available as an Excel file in the online supplementary materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate and verify the new model developed from the Joyce et al (2016) framework, we need to display that the model (a) is useable, (b) represents the real world system with a sufficient level of accuracy and (c) matches current state of the art (Carson, 2002). We selected an approach, similar to the one described by Harder et al (2014) and Heimersson et al (2014) and performed impact method evaluation, sensitivity checks, and midpoint and endpoint indicator cross comparison.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations