2014
DOI: 10.1352/2326-6988-2.4.252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Inclusive Educational Delivery Systems

Abstract: This article introduces a theoretical framework for an inclusive educational delivery system to increase academic, behavioral, and social outcomes for all students with a variety and range of abilities. The framework is a fully braided delivery system that brings together evidencebased practices for individual school systems and structures, district and state education policy, and family and community engagement. We describe (a) systemic and structural challenges to inclusive education, (b) the framework and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include a school culture in which educators assume collective responsibility for the success of all students, ongoing training and support for teachers in the use of inclusive practices, and school schedules that provide adequate time for teacher collaboration (Bettini, Crockett, Brownell, & Merrill, 2016; McLeskey, Waldron, & Redd, 2014; McLeskey, Waldron, Spooner, & Algozzine, 2014). An emerging body of research provides more guidance on school organization for inclusion through tiered systems of support (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2007; McCart, Sailor, Bezdek, & Satter, 2014; Sailor & Roger, 2005). When inclusion is embedded in school-wide frameworks such as multitiered systems of support (Multi-Tiered Systems of Support [MTSS]) and Response to Intervention (RTI), schools reorganize their resource allocation to support students not responding to traditional instruction in a way that is driven by data on student needs rather than traditional general and special education distinctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include a school culture in which educators assume collective responsibility for the success of all students, ongoing training and support for teachers in the use of inclusive practices, and school schedules that provide adequate time for teacher collaboration (Bettini, Crockett, Brownell, & Merrill, 2016; McLeskey, Waldron, & Redd, 2014; McLeskey, Waldron, Spooner, & Algozzine, 2014). An emerging body of research provides more guidance on school organization for inclusion through tiered systems of support (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2007; McCart, Sailor, Bezdek, & Satter, 2014; Sailor & Roger, 2005). When inclusion is embedded in school-wide frameworks such as multitiered systems of support (Multi-Tiered Systems of Support [MTSS]) and Response to Intervention (RTI), schools reorganize their resource allocation to support students not responding to traditional instruction in a way that is driven by data on student needs rather than traditional general and special education distinctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWIFT uses evidence-based practices to transform leadership, policies, organizational structures, and relationships to support improved academic and behavior outcomes for all students, including those with the most extensive support needs. Trusting familyschool and community-school partnerships comprise 2 of the 10 features of SWIFT, an evidence-based model for inclusive school reform (McCart, Sailor, Bezdek, & Satter, 2014; see www.swiftschools.org). SWIFT describes family-school partnerships as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the fact that descriptive and attitudinal work is more methodically easier. However, for scientific progress, it is necessary to go beyond the problem and possible analyses (McCart, Sailor, Bezdek, and Satter. 2014).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%