2021
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2021.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Informal Learning Analytics - Evidence from the Literacy Domain

Abstract: Multidisciplinary approaches to learning analytics (LA) have the potential to provide important insights into student learning beyond interactions within learning management systems (LMS). In this paper we demonstrate the benefits of such an approach by proposing a framework that adds the contextual elements of task design, tools and technologies and datasets to established LA processes. Our framework was developed as a design science research (DSR) artifact, working with teachers of English at two Swedish sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond academia and some workplace settings, the surveillance that many learning analytics systems require may be deemed unacceptable, especially for incidental informal learning. However, tools that support the discovery of learning interactions within social networks and forums, identifying community goals, tasks, and connections, have been used to good effect (e.g., Petrushyna, Klamma, & Kravcik, 2015), and work continues to automatically identify learning activities and interactions in open, online environments (e.g., Rizk & Rodriguez, 2021).…”
Section: Tracking Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond academia and some workplace settings, the surveillance that many learning analytics systems require may be deemed unacceptable, especially for incidental informal learning. However, tools that support the discovery of learning interactions within social networks and forums, identifying community goals, tasks, and connections, have been used to good effect (e.g., Petrushyna, Klamma, & Kravcik, 2015), and work continues to automatically identify learning activities and interactions in open, online environments (e.g., Rizk & Rodriguez, 2021).…”
Section: Tracking Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%