2011
DOI: 10.1108/s0732-0671(2011)0000030006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Institutional Repository Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the literature about IR assessment does focus on collecting and reporting quantitative metrics to help make the case for IR value, "Metrics for repositories can be used to provide a better understanding of how repositories are being used, which can help to inform policy decisions on future investment" . A 2011 study of several high-profile IR reported that "assessment measures are still being developed," but that "most institutions found it easier to develop quantitative measures of success [including] the number of requests" (Campbell-Meier, 2011). Others also reinforce that specific measures based on quantifiable data will resonate, even if those reports must be customized to the audience.…”
Section: Assessment Of Institutional Repositoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature about IR assessment does focus on collecting and reporting quantitative metrics to help make the case for IR value, "Metrics for repositories can be used to provide a better understanding of how repositories are being used, which can help to inform policy decisions on future investment" . A 2011 study of several high-profile IR reported that "assessment measures are still being developed," but that "most institutions found it easier to develop quantitative measures of success [including] the number of requests" (Campbell-Meier, 2011). Others also reinforce that specific measures based on quantifiable data will resonate, even if those reports must be customized to the audience.…”
Section: Assessment Of Institutional Repositoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global research suggests that the growth of OAIR in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) has increased significantly with the implementation of an open source initiative in the field of scholarly communication and software development (Campbell-Meier 2011). Campbell-Meier adds that the demand for OAIR has increased as a result of improvements in scholarly communication models and the need to develop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Campbell-Meier (2011), the author examined case studies where the IR developers with ETDs found the relationship with the graduate division was crucial to the success of the ETD implementation. This type of partnership places the responsibility of IR submissions on the graduate division and the students submitting their ETDs as a graduation requirement.…”
Section: Partnerships For Specific Types Of Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faculty are also a potential submitter of IR content but the library liaison relationship is not developed the same way as it was with the graduate division and ETD project. Content identification and recruitment is a new role that some liaison librarians are not comfortable with (Campbell-Meier, 2011) but is one possible solution to a faster increase of non-ETD IR content. Discussions library liaisons facilitate with faculty about the IR, including perceived benefits, may help market and recruit faculty participation.…”
Section: Partnerships For Specific Types Of Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%