A framework for journal assessment: The case of the Journal of Banking &amp; Finance

Borokhovich, Kenneth A.; Lee, Allissa A.; Simkins, Betty J.

doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.006

Cited by 29 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This suggests that JFQA and JBF are in close proximity in the sense that their utility isoquants (over journal quality and awareness) are relatively close. These results on JBF's growing influence from the Active Scholar Assessment study (conducted in May 2009) are also consistent with a recent citation-based study of Borokhovich et al (2011) which analyses JBF cites among 12 leading finance journals. 4 The Association of Business Schools tiering system defines 10% of the top journals in the field as being in tier A (Harvey et al, 2008).…”

Section: Journal Rankings and Tierssupporting

confidence: 85%

“…Later studies tend to use citation measures based upon the argument that the number of publications measure scholarly output while the number of citations received is more reflective of scholarly impact (Alexander and Mabry, 1994;Borokhovich et al, 1995Borokhovich et al, , 2000Chung et al, 2001;Chan et al, 2002;Borokhovich et al, 2011). More recently, studies have used peer assessments to rank finance journal quality by surveying select groups of individuals within the finance research community (Borde et al, 1999;Oltheten et al, 2005).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology

Currie

Pandher

2011

Journal of Banking & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Journal Rankings and Tierssupporting

confidence: 85%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology

Currie

Pandher

2011

Journal of Banking & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Traditionally, journal quality has been assessed using survey results (Coe and Weinstock, ; Borde, Cheney, and Madura, ; Oltheten et al., ; Currie and Pandher, ) or citation data (Mabry and Sharplin, ; Alexander and Mabry, ; Zivney and Reichenstein, ; Borokhovich et al., ; Chan et al., ; Borokhovich, Lee, and Simkins, ) . However, the effectiveness of these approaches decreases as one progresses down the pecking order of journals.…”

Section: Assessing Finance Journal Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Voting with Their Feet: In Which Journals Do the Most Prolific Finance Researchers Publish?

Danielson¹,

Heck²

2013

Financial Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The financial economics literature has experienced rapid growth over the past 40 years, triggering a dramatic increase in the number of journals. We employ a new method to analyze the current pecking order of finance journals. Specifically, we analyze the publication records of prolific authors to provide evidence regarding the perceived quality of a set of 23 high‐impact finance journals. Assuming these scholars target the “best” research outlets, their publication records can reveal information about their subjective rankings of the next‐best alternatives to the traditional elite finance journals. The results suggest that prolific authors are most likely to target outlets that have raised their profile in recent years (e.g., Financial Management and Financial Analysts Journal) and new specialized finance journals (e.g., Journal of Financial Markets, Journal of Corporate Finance, and Journal of Financial Intermediation) when publishing outside the set of elite journals.

show abstract

“…Other authors have strictly focused on one journal [10,[19][20][21]. Furthermore, it is becoming very popular the analysis of financial research of a single country or a region such as Canada [22], Europe [23] or Asia [24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis in financial research

Merigó

Yang

2014

2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering &Amp; Economics (CIFEr)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bibliometrics is a research field that analyzes the bibliographic material quantitatively. It provides efficient methodologies for classifying the information of a scientific discipline. This paper presents an overview of the most productive and influential authors and institutions in finance by using bibliometric indicators. The information is classified by using several global rankings that consider a wide range of indicators including number of papers, citations and the hindex. In general, the results are in accordance with the common knowledge and confirm the results obtained in previous studies providing updated information and more general representations. The USA is the most influential country in finance and the majority of influential authors and institutions are working there.

show abstract

A framework for journal assessment: The case of the Journal of Banking & Finance

Cited by 29 publications

References 9 publications

Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology

Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology

Voting with Their Feet: In Which Journals Do the Most Prolific Finance Researchers Publish?

Bibliometric analysis in financial research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About