“…The best reported retrieval result in [10] on a dataset of 1,501 radiological images of 17 classes was 0.62, 0.67, and 0.66 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr− Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [10]). The best performance of the presented CBIR system in [20] based on a database consisting of 5,000 images of 20 classes was 0.68, 0.82, and 0.72 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [20]). The best performance of the presented iterative classification-based image retrieval framework in [21] based on dataset of ImageCLEF 2005 consisting of 10,000 medical X-ray images of 57 classes (9,000 images as training dataset and 1,000 images as test dataset) was 0.915, 0.88, 0.71, and 0.67 for Pr (20), Pr(Re= Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively.…”