2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2009.5354172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for planning comfortable and customizable motion of an assistive mobile robot

Abstract: Assistive mobile robots that can navigate autonomously can greatly benefit people with mobility impairments. Since an assistive mobile robot transports a human user from one place to another, its motion should be comfortable for human users. Moreover, it should be possible for users to customize the motion according to their comfort. While there exists a large body of work on motion planning for mobile robots, very little attention has been paid to characterizing comfort and planning comfortable trajectories. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to construct more realistic cost functions, others inspired by design research incorporate a measure of “discomfort” into the optimization cost function [15]. However, the specific form of the cost function is domain dependent and is not generalizable to other assistive devices such as robotic arms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to construct more realistic cost functions, others inspired by design research incorporate a measure of “discomfort” into the optimization cost function [15]. However, the specific form of the cost function is domain dependent and is not generalizable to other assistive devices such as robotic arms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to generate appropriate motion trajectories also is a topic of interest-for example, trajectories that take into account human comfort (115) or social considerations such as how to pass a pedestrian (116).…”
Section: System Design and Autonomy Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of "comfort" has already appeared in the literature with different meanings: 1) comfort of the AP when navigating using a robotic platform [17,29] and 2) comfort of the humans in the area surrounding an autonomous robot [22]. Our notion of comfort belongs to the first class and it is deeply rooted in the requirement analysis and in the validation activities with senior users that we have been conducting in the context of the DALi and of the ACANTO projects.…”
Section: Global Constraints and Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%