2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2014.6942823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for predicting the mission-specific performance of autonomous unmanned systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of autonomy level is an important aspect to compare and evaluate the performance of the system presented in this paper. Several models have been proposed to assess the autonomy level of the systems, including autonomy level evaluation [38] formulated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Autonomous Control Levels (ACL) method [39] proposed by the U.S. military, and the Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) framework [40] by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-each model has its drawbacks [41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of autonomy level is an important aspect to compare and evaluate the performance of the system presented in this paper. Several models have been proposed to assess the autonomy level of the systems, including autonomy level evaluation [38] formulated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Autonomous Control Levels (ACL) method [39] proposed by the U.S. military, and the Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) framework [40] by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-each model has its drawbacks [41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomous ground vehicle companies resort to driving millions of miles to perform validation tests, which is generally economically impractical [13][14][15]. Some strategies focus on autonomy level opposed to mission performance such as in the Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) framework [10,16] and the US Army Mission Performance Potential (MPP) framework [17]. These techniques predict expected performance for a mission set and level of autonomy but it does not directly compare the performances of varying types of autonomy algorithms, nor does it provide a direct measure of vehicle performance for individual iterations of a given mission scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the last twenty years, the development of mobile robotics and autonomous intelligent systems has experienced a rapid growth and becoming a part of our way of life, ranging from factory transport systems [1], airport transport systems, road/vehicular systems, to military applications [2], automated patrol systems [3], homeland security surveillance [4], rescue operations [5], and ambient assistants for elderly or disabled people [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%