2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Programming Norm-Aware Multi-agent Systems

Abstract: Abstract. We propose a programming framework for the implementation of norm-aware multi-agent systems. The framework integrates the N-2APL normaware agent programming language with the 2OPL organisation programming language. Integration of N-2APL and 2OPL is achieved using a tuple space which represents both the (brute) state of the multi-agent environment and the detached norms and sanctions comprising its normative state. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first implementation of an integrated framewo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, social institutions may be translated into computer code that regulates the behavior of and interactions between AAs (Leenes and Lucivero 2014). This is particularly done in the (research) field of normative multi-agent systems, in which it has become common to design artificial multi-agent systems that are composed of not only AAs but also (encoded) norms (see, e.g., Hollander and Wu 2011;Singh 2014;Dybalova et al 2014;Boissier 2006;Mahmoud et al 2014). To distinguish such norms from social norms (and institutions), I call them technical norms, although they are often not technical at the semantic level.…”
Section: Norms In Artificial Multi-agent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, social institutions may be translated into computer code that regulates the behavior of and interactions between AAs (Leenes and Lucivero 2014). This is particularly done in the (research) field of normative multi-agent systems, in which it has become common to design artificial multi-agent systems that are composed of not only AAs but also (encoded) norms (see, e.g., Hollander and Wu 2011;Singh 2014;Dybalova et al 2014;Boissier 2006;Mahmoud et al 2014). To distinguish such norms from social norms (and institutions), I call them technical norms, although they are often not technical at the semantic level.…”
Section: Norms In Artificial Multi-agent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The belief base (B) is updated by P in the belief update process (belief-updatefunction (buf) more precisely) (see lines [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This belief update involves the creation of events in response to each new percept.…”
Section: The N-jason Interpretermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (potential) sanctions may affect agent decision making, but violations are possible in this approach. Given N-2APL, Dybalova et al [9] demonstrate norm-compliant agents in location-based gaming environments in conjunction with the organisational framework, 2OPL [6]. There, once organisations have broadcast state-based norms to all participants, the individual agents achieve a state of the environment described in the norms using a design-based approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A norm is an application of a rule to one or more agents for which a sanction is incurred by an entity who breaks it (Alechina et al, 2012;Dybalova et al, 2014). These rules can take the form of obligations or prohibitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%