2020
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for science classroom assessment task design for emergent bilingual learners

Abstract: The Framework for K–12 Science Education (NRC; 2012) placed renewed emphasis on creating equitable science learning opportunities for all learners by engaging in three‐dimensional learning experiences: disciplinary core ideas, crosscutting concepts, and science and engineering practices. Additionally, the Framework calls for a more inclusive approach to science learning that builds upon learners' linguistic practices and funds of knowledge and integrates open‐ended, multimodal approaches to documenting learnin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the ways science learning has been conceptualized has always been inclusive for some and exclusionary for others who don't fit the white normative status quo, reinforcing the culture-wide power imbalance in favor of whiteness. Time and time again, considerations in the area of assessments for vulnerable and historically marginalized populations are often done as an afterthought, a post hoc step with accommodations (Abedi, 2004;Mislevy & Duran, 2014;Solano-Flores & Trumbull, 2003) rather than designing with them in mind at the inception (Fine & Furtak, 2020).…”
Section: Positionality Of Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the ways science learning has been conceptualized has always been inclusive for some and exclusionary for others who don't fit the white normative status quo, reinforcing the culture-wide power imbalance in favor of whiteness. Time and time again, considerations in the area of assessments for vulnerable and historically marginalized populations are often done as an afterthought, a post hoc step with accommodations (Abedi, 2004;Mislevy & Duran, 2014;Solano-Flores & Trumbull, 2003) rather than designing with them in mind at the inception (Fine & Furtak, 2020).…”
Section: Positionality Of Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vital thing that must be done by teachers is to introduce specific terms in the field of science because pupils who take a bilingual program tend to remember terms or vocabulary that are unique in the scientific field (Maxwell-Reid, 2020). The absolute thing that must be taken by the teacher is to formulate and design a special assessment by considering many aspects (Fine & Furtak, 2020).…”
Section: Science Class and English As Medium Of Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Buxton and Caswell (2020) identified uses of visuals and models to offer meaning‐making opportunities for students and found that “engagement in multimodal and intertextual approaches helped students gain access to key ideas” (p. 574). Consistent with multimodal instruction are the use of diagrams, graphics, and models for formative assessment of students' learning (Fine & Furtak, 2020). These examples from science education suggest that such uses of language can engage all learners, and this potential of engineering may similarly be especially productive for ELs.…”
Section: Asset‐based Approaches For Engineering Education With Elsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with multimodal instruction are the use of diagrams, graphics, and models for formative assessment of students' learning (Fine & Furtak, 2020). These examples from science education suggest that such uses of language can engage all learners, and this potential of engineering may similarly be especially productive for ELs.…”
Section: Using Multiple Modal Communication and Discursive Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%