2010
DOI: 10.1108/17410381011014396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for selection of material handling equipment in manufacturing and logistics facilities

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to assist facility design practitioners, industrial managers, and expert systems (ES) developers identify important issues to consider and actions to follow in the selection of material handling (MH) equipment, overcome limitations of existing equipment selection approaches, and design complete MH systems. Design/methodology/approach -A framework that specifies the steps that have to be taken in the selection of MH equipment is suggested. It identifies categories of equipm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Welgama and Gibson [8] categorized layout and material handling system problems into three approaches: layout is given, handling approaches are given, and neither is given [8][9][10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welgama and Gibson [8] categorized layout and material handling system problems into three approaches: layout is given, handling approaches are given, and neither is given [8][9][10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Styles et al (2009) articulated an innovative, quantitative assessment of pollution avoidance attributable to environmental regulation enforced through integrated licensing, using Ireland’s pharmaceutical-manufacturing sector as a case study. Mohsen (2010) constructed a framework after conducting the literature review in regard to MHS, where framework brought the financial and green aspects of MHE. Monch et al suggested that in the future, various precise characteristics related to modern AMHS must be taken into account more precisely, so that more precise planning related to MHS could be determined.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as qualitative criteria for constructing the practical valid MCDM index/module for MHS evaluation perspective. Chen (1985), Chen and Chen (2006, 2009), Lopez et al (2008), Styles et al (2009), Mohsen (2010), Diabat and Govindan (2011), Maniya and Bhatt (2011), Passuello et al (2012), Mesa-Frias et al (2013), Dey and Cheffi (2013), Chien (2014), Wang et al (2014), Sahu et al (2012, 2013a, 2014a, b, e), Karande and Chakraborty (2013), Annamalai and Namasivayam (2015), Mitrano et al (2015), Furmans (2015) and Khandekar and Chakraborty (2015) stimulate the authors to carry forward the proposed research. Few literature reviews amongst aforesaid (Chen, 1985; Furmans, 2015) also helped to choose effectual criteria to be induced into MCDM appraisement module and to analysis and evaluate the best effective MCDM methods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11 ] developed a prototype expert system for selecting industrial conveyors with the aim of providing solutions for MHE along with a list of potential vendors. Mohsen and Hassan [ 21 ] developed a framework to support practitioners, managers and expert systems developers in selecting MHE in manufacturing and logistics facilities. Chan et al .…”
Section: Survey Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%