2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01765-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Semantic Interoperability in 3D Tangible Cultural Heritage in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, as will be explained in the following paragraphs, the first reason was the impossibility to transform huge polygonal models in a BIM parametric environment, because of their physical features such as size, weight, accuracy and not smooth shape. However, interesting studies have overcome this issue converting meshed 3D objects with a very small size into parametric objects, resulting very useful for real and accurate parts such sculptural pieces or potential elements that must be catalogued (Nieto et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Main 3d Modelling Techniques: Pros and Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, as will be explained in the following paragraphs, the first reason was the impossibility to transform huge polygonal models in a BIM parametric environment, because of their physical features such as size, weight, accuracy and not smooth shape. However, interesting studies have overcome this issue converting meshed 3D objects with a very small size into parametric objects, resulting very useful for real and accurate parts such sculptural pieces or potential elements that must be catalogued (Nieto et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Main 3d Modelling Techniques: Pros and Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a Scan-to-BIM process is a useful tool able to represent the uniqueness of the elements detected both from the morphological point of view (value of the measurement) and from the semantic and typological point of view (value of the 3D drawings and digital modelling). Furthermore, in recent years we have witnessed how attention to detail has become an added value for the generation of HBIM models of buildings of high historical and cultural value (Antonopoulou & Bryan, 2017;Arayici et al, 2017;Fai & Rafeiro, 2014, Kuo et al, 2018Tucci et al, 2019). The value of the measurement in digital models was respected, on the one hand, thanks to the introduction of a new parameter in the HBIM models: the grade of accuracy (GOA) of Scan-to-BIM models based on the standard deviation between point clouds and final model (Banfi, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the growing need to improve the management and conservation of the built heritage has led to the development of interesting studies in the field of HBIM (Kuo et al 2018) (Fai et al 2014) (Tucci & Bonora 2011). Innovative methods in the field of digitisation of the built heritage have underlined the need to orientate BIM applications also for heritage artefacts (Stanga et al 2017).…”
Section: Related Work and Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of researches about HBIM is increasing rapidly in recent years. In addition to the efficient integration to various information of cultural heritage, HBIM can also be the exchange platform for the cultural heritage conservation and other existing spatial information (Kuo et al, 2018). It is a very meaningful tool for the management of built heritage in the digital age.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%