2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcde.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for similarity recognition of CAD models

Abstract: A designer is mainly supported by two essential factors in design decisions. These two factors are intelligence and experience aiding the designer by predicting the interconnection between the required design parameters. Through classification of product data and similarity recognition between new and existing designs, it is partially possible to replace the required experience for an inexperienced designer. Given this context, the current paper addresses a framework for recognition and flexible retrieval of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors recommended that the data classification standard to be firstly used to information structure modeling, and secondly to confirm which information can be acquired via wireless technology in different lifecycle stages. In order to integrate heterogeneous information systems in creating innovative products, the data classification standards of product data and product meta-data were discussed by Zehtaban et al (2016). To achieve sustainable production, Kurilova-Palisaitiene et al (2015) classified the product lifecycle data into six types, which included, product design specifications, manufacturing specifications, service specifications, original product quality assurance, core quality assurance, remanufactured product quality assurance.…”
Section: Classification Of Big Data From the Perspective Of Product Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors recommended that the data classification standard to be firstly used to information structure modeling, and secondly to confirm which information can be acquired via wireless technology in different lifecycle stages. In order to integrate heterogeneous information systems in creating innovative products, the data classification standards of product data and product meta-data were discussed by Zehtaban et al (2016). To achieve sustainable production, Kurilova-Palisaitiene et al (2015) classified the product lifecycle data into six types, which included, product design specifications, manufacturing specifications, service specifications, original product quality assurance, core quality assurance, remanufactured product quality assurance.…”
Section: Classification Of Big Data From the Perspective Of Product Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them can also detect partial similarities, i.e. models that are similar only for a subset of their shape [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the point cloud consists of a list of 3D coordinates for points, we compare the segmented point cloud with an information object in the BIM or the catalog library of plant 3D CAD system from the viewpoint of similarity of shape and select the information object corresponding to the segmented point cloud. Thus, a 3D shape retrieval method [7,8] is necessary such that, when the segmented point cloud is input as a query, the object that is the most similar shape is retrieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%