2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-008-9268-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Simulation and Testing of UAVs in Cooperative Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of indoor environments the integration of Laser Range Finder or camera could significantly improve the overall performance (Cesetti et al (2010); Ascani et al (2008)). Future works will be steered to extend the set of sensors integrating visual information based on SIFT/SURF feature detection also for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (Khoshelham et al (2010)) in multi-robot scenarios (Mancini et al (2009)) and to evaluate this technology also for the pedestrian localization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of indoor environments the integration of Laser Range Finder or camera could significantly improve the overall performance (Cesetti et al (2010); Ascani et al (2008)). Future works will be steered to extend the set of sensors integrating visual information based on SIFT/SURF feature detection also for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (Khoshelham et al (2010)) in multi-robot scenarios (Mancini et al (2009)) and to evaluate this technology also for the pedestrian localization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, this studies simulation fails to consider the effects of atmospheric pressure, wind, turbulence, gravity or UAV dynamics on the drones. Considering these factors has been viewed as an important part of the realism of UAV flight simulations [32] and therefore the findings of this project may be less applicable to real-world scenarios. Secondly, this study applied restrictions on the D* Lite implementation (see Section 2.6.2) for the algorithm to be applied to the real-time simulation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By exploiting our experience in the development of frameworks for mobile robot simulation and test [6], [7], [8] and in real-time and embedded systems [9], [10], we set our framework at a higher level of abstraction compared to the most common solutions in designing real-time firmware for embedded testing platforms. In particular, two main characteristics of our framework are: i) the software architecture is organized in layers that reflects different levels of abstraction; ii) each software layer is based on an open source operating system and therefore it does not show the same restrictions of commercial systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%