AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-4158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for the Discovery of Passive-Control, Minimum Energy Satellite Constellations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 As noted by Ferringer et al, these perturbative effects can result in as much as a 60% reduction in constellation performance over a 10-year period when the constellation is passively controlled. 11 Due to this deficiency, rather than use the constellation as prescribed in Draim 2 GRIPS was configured to optimize a 4-satellite design given only prescribed periods (constraints on , ). By giving GRIPS the flexibility to search beyond Draim's prescribed orbits, it was allowed to discover whether or not passively controlled, global coverage were possible in a heavily perturbed regime.…”
Section: Constellation Design Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 As noted by Ferringer et al, these perturbative effects can result in as much as a 60% reduction in constellation performance over a 10-year period when the constellation is passively controlled. 11 Due to this deficiency, rather than use the constellation as prescribed in Draim 2 GRIPS was configured to optimize a 4-satellite design given only prescribed periods (constraints on , ). By giving GRIPS the flexibility to search beyond Draim's prescribed orbits, it was allowed to discover whether or not passively controlled, global coverage were possible in a heavily perturbed regime.…”
Section: Constellation Design Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A revisitation of Draim's original 4-satellite global coverage constellation is considered under the influence of higher order perturbation forces such as oblateearth effects, atmospheric drag, as well as gravitational effects of the Sun and Moon. This high-fidelity propagation is performed using The Aerospace Corporation's Spacecraft High-fidelity Astrodynamics Resource Kit (SHARK) 11 which feeds spacecraft positional data to The Aerospace Corporation's coverage analysis tool, REVISIT. 12 As noted by Ferringer et al, these perturbative effects can result in as much as a 60% reduction in constellation performance over a 10-year period when the constellation is passively controlled.…”
Section: Constellation Design Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The astrodynamics simulations of alternative rainfall focused satellite portfolios exploit the Spacecraft High-fidelity Astrodynamics Resource Kit (SHARK) simulation (Vallado 2001, Montenbruck and Gill 2005, Ferringer et al 2014, which predicts the satellites' motion as a function of time. These low earth orbit missions are intermittent coverage constellations, which have complex distributions of data gaps (Hou et al 2008).…”
Section: Astrodynamics Mission Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to accumulate the satellite overpasses or gaps into metrics that allow for the evaluation of the quality of coverage. The Revisit software (Ferringer et al 2007, Ferringer et al 2014 uses the position vector information from the SHARK simulation to determine visibility to ground locations and computes coverage statistics for multi-sensor, multi-constraint satellite constellation architectures. Several of the most common metrics are maximum revisit time, average revisit time, maximum coverage gap, mean coverage gap, percent coverage, daily visibility time and mean response time.…”
Section: Astrodynamics Mission Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason to define this new measure is that other commonly used metrics such as mean revisit time are insensitive to scenarios with undesirable long gaps, which are compensated with numerous short gaps. Also, most papers in the literature only look at optimizing orbital parameters [15,12,14,13,24,25,26,33,34,17], whereas this work also incorporates other important aspects in the orbit selection process, such as robustness and deployment strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%