Proceedings of the 2nd SIGMOD PhD Workshop on Innovative Database Research 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1410308.1410313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for web service discovery

Abstract: With proliferation of published Web services, the task of finding relevant ones for the developers of service oriented application becomes more and more difficult. Several existing tools or mechanisms allow this discovery; however, those approaches often skip different elements such as service's quality, reuse, evolution and users' comment making the discovery result feebly relevant to requesters' need and prevent the requesters from using up-to-date and available web services efficiently. In this research wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally, only low-level information on the operations of the web resources (such as the basic interface details like method names, types and parameters) was available, or non-functional criteria such as response time or usage data (Birukou et al, 2007); Al-Masri and Mahmoud, 2007). The development of registries based on standards such as UDDI allowed the addition of metadata-based techniques (Dong et al, 2004;Chukmol, 2008;Crasso et al, 2008), initially based on traditional keyword search but eventually considering more advanced IR techniques (Plebani and Pernici, 2009) and, in line with the priorities of our work, a more user-oriented view (Rong and Liu, 2010), explicitly based on requirements (Hao and Zhang, 2007;Hao et al, 2010;Nazir et al, 2008). (Skoutas et al, 2010) also bases the discovery of web services on the requirements and, ranks and clusters the relevant services with objective measures based on dominance relationships among them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, only low-level information on the operations of the web resources (such as the basic interface details like method names, types and parameters) was available, or non-functional criteria such as response time or usage data (Birukou et al, 2007); Al-Masri and Mahmoud, 2007). The development of registries based on standards such as UDDI allowed the addition of metadata-based techniques (Dong et al, 2004;Chukmol, 2008;Crasso et al, 2008), initially based on traditional keyword search but eventually considering more advanced IR techniques (Plebani and Pernici, 2009) and, in line with the priorities of our work, a more user-oriented view (Rong and Liu, 2010), explicitly based on requirements (Hao and Zhang, 2007;Hao et al, 2010;Nazir et al, 2008). (Skoutas et al, 2010) also bases the discovery of web services on the requirements and, ranks and clusters the relevant services with objective measures based on dominance relationships among them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%