2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Herders with such negative attitudes were more likely to refuse WL (Sulemana and James 2014;Marques et al 2015;Hammes et al 2016). Some researchers have shown that herder attitude played an important role in helping or hindering individual adoption of new technologies (Subedi et al 2009;Kerschner and Ehlers 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herders with such negative attitudes were more likely to refuse WL (Sulemana and James 2014;Marques et al 2015;Hammes et al 2016). Some researchers have shown that herder attitude played an important role in helping or hindering individual adoption of new technologies (Subedi et al 2009;Kerschner and Ehlers 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techno-utopia of a world ruled by friendly superintelligence reveals extreme technological enthusiasm and technocracy, inKerschner and Ehlers' (2016) terminology. Technocracy is also apparent in moves to avoid public implication in this issue (Supplementary Material).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a strong instance of technocracy (terminology in[8]), as a one-sided attempt to develop a device expected to replace human governance. One alleged motivation is to crowd out a possible hostile superintelligence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Wynne (2006) however, the deficit mode of thinking remains; although education is replaced with participation, the aim is still to prevent unfavourable attitudes rather than truly give control to the public. Second, the deficit model continues to remain popular among technical experts and policymakers (Kerschner & Ehlers, 2016). Consequently, much current science communication is still influenced by the deficit model (Miller, 2001;Bauer, Allum, & Miller, 2007;Durant, 1999;Bauer, 2016).…”
Section: Evolution and Limitation Of The Dominant Approach In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%