A framework of NGO inside and outside strategies in the commercial determinants of health: findings from a narrative review

Abstract

Background Public health scholarship has uncovered a wide range of strategies used by industry actors to promote their products and influence government regulation. Less is known about the strategies used by non-government organisations to attempt to influence commercial practices. This narrative review applies a political science typology to identify a suite of ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ strategies used by NGOs to attempt to influence the commercial determinants of health. Methods We conducted a systematic search in Web of Science, ProQuest and Scopus. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they comprised an empirical study, explicitly sought to examine ‘NGOs’, were in English, and identified at least one NGO strategy aimed at commercial and/or government policy and practice. Results One hundred forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight industry sectors were identified: extractive, tobacco, food, alcohol, pharmaceuticals, weapons, textiles and asbestos, and a small number of general studies. We identified 18 types of NGO strategies, categorised according to the target (i.e. commercial actor or government actor) and type of interaction with the target (i.e. inside or outside). Of these, five NGO ‘inside’ strategies targeted commercial actors directly: 1) participation in partnerships and multistakeholder initiatives; 2) private meetings and roundtables; 3) engaging with company AGMs and shareholders; 4) collaborations other than partnerships; and 5) litigation. ‘Outside’ strategies targeting commercial actors through the mobilisation of public opinion included 1) monitoring and reporting; 2) protests at industry sites; 3) boycotts; 4) directly engaging the public; and 5) creative use of alternative spaces. Four NGO ‘inside’ strategies directly targeting government actors included: 1) lobbying; 2) drafting legislation, policies and standards; 3) providing technical support and training; and 4) litigation. NGO ‘outside’ strategies targeting government included 1) protests and public campaigns; 2) monitoring and reporting; 3) forum shifting; and 4) proposing and initiating alternative solutions. We identified three types of NGO impact: substantive, procedural, and normative. Conclusion The analysis presents a matrix of NGO strategies used to target commercial and government actors across a range of industry sectors. This framework can be used to guide examination of which NGO strategies are effective and appropriate, and which conditions enable NGO influence.

Commentary: The role of single nucleotide polymorphisms related to iron homeostasis in mesothelioma susceptibility after asbestos exposure: a genetic study on autoptic samples

“…(ii) The case of asbestos is one of the most classical paradigms relating environmental factors with a disease ( 4 ); the asbestos removal campaign has made a great progress, especially in Europe, however must be further expanded toward the target of total eradication ( 5 ).…”

How can advocates leverage power to advance comprehensive regulation on ultra- processed foods? Learning from advocate experience in Argentina

“…While a growing scholarship has been dedicated to de-mystifying the ins and outs of the 'corporate playbook' to protect industry interests and stymie public health policy, comparatively little scholarship has been devoted to examining how public health advocates can counter this activity and promote successful policy decisions. Some studies focus on identifying strategies from the precedent of tobacco control [42,43,44,45,46,47], while others focus on strategies to counter the commercial determinants of health in general [48,49,50]. A few case studies have also been conducted to examine drivers of policy success in food governance, predominantly in the case of sugary drink taxes [51,52,53,54,55].…”

The politics of regulating ultra-processed foods for public health: an analysis of Codex standard-setting processes on food labelling

“…38 A growing body of scholarship shows that UPF-relevant regulations are contested by different actors and interests, including the food industry, governments, and civil society organizations (CSOs). 2,3,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] The UPF industry itself is dominated by major manufacturers headquartered mainly in the United States and EU, as well as a global network of lobby groups and trade associations, who contest food regulations at the international and national levels, conducive to ongoing market growth. 2,3 Yet, few studies have investigated the contestation of Codex standards, including who is involved, how, and in response to what issues and whom.…”