2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework to assess mining within social-ecological systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More and more studies are emphasizing the importance of underground spaces as sites of multidisciplinary investigations (Melo‐Zurita et al, 2018; Powis, 2021). In social sciences, the subsurface is not new to scholars studying access to underground resources, mining activities, and extractivism and how they reflect issues of governance and socio‐environmental harm and injustices (Bebbington, 2012; Braun, 2000; Keeling & Sandlos, 2009; Le Gouill & Poupeau, 2020; Nash, 1993). Urban political ecologists, looking at subterranean infrastructures and resources, have also proposed a dynamic approach to the interactions between the subsurface and the ground, as the underground works as a sphere of intense circulation of materials, water, sewerage, and waste but also people (Gandy, 2004; Gille & Lepawsky, 2022; Swyngedouw, 2006).…”
Section: Thinking Verticality: Why It Matters In Socio‐hydrosystem St...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More and more studies are emphasizing the importance of underground spaces as sites of multidisciplinary investigations (Melo‐Zurita et al, 2018; Powis, 2021). In social sciences, the subsurface is not new to scholars studying access to underground resources, mining activities, and extractivism and how they reflect issues of governance and socio‐environmental harm and injustices (Bebbington, 2012; Braun, 2000; Keeling & Sandlos, 2009; Le Gouill & Poupeau, 2020; Nash, 1993). Urban political ecologists, looking at subterranean infrastructures and resources, have also proposed a dynamic approach to the interactions between the subsurface and the ground, as the underground works as a sphere of intense circulation of materials, water, sewerage, and waste but also people (Gandy, 2004; Gille & Lepawsky, 2022; Swyngedouw, 2006).…”
Section: Thinking Verticality: Why It Matters In Socio‐hydrosystem St...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting supplement to these studies was proposed in the article by C. Le Guill and F. Poupeau [16], in which the framework of the social-economic system developed by E. Ostrom was verified, which also allows for the evaluation of new mining processes. The presented analysis of cases from Peru and the USA led to the identification of structural factors for these types of projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented analysis of cases from Peru and the USA led to the identification of structural factors for these types of projects. The main part of this analysis is related to the activity of stakeholders [16] (p. 6). On the other hand, the factor defined by researchers as "strategic development of the company" was verified as a sub-structuring factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%