2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2970614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fraud Detection Method for Low-Frequency Transaction

Abstract: The effectiveness of transaction fraud detection methods directly affects the loss of users in online transactions. However, for low-frequency users with small transaction volume, the existing methods cannot accurately describe their transaction behaviors for each user, or lead to a high misjudgment rate. So we propose a new method for individual behavior construction, which can make the behavior of low-frequency users more accurate by migrating the current transaction group behavior and transaction status. Fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Maniraj et al [14] "Credit Card Fraud Detection using Machine Learning and Data Science", is firstly passed the dataset through a local outlier factor and then through an isolation forest algorithm [15][16][17]. Then the authors applied the technique on the dataset obtained from a German bank in 2006.…”
Section: Literature Survey and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Maniraj et al [14] "Credit Card Fraud Detection using Machine Learning and Data Science", is firstly passed the dataset through a local outlier factor and then through an isolation forest algorithm [15][16][17]. Then the authors applied the technique on the dataset obtained from a German bank in 2006.…”
Section: Literature Survey and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] the problem with this approach is that random forest always leads to an over tting problem. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] are about the implementation of the best performing models in the real-time scenario. According to these papers most of the real-time implementation is in the beginning stage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection of such a dataset is done with the help of human loss prevention specialists who manually annotate data. Then, as the literature suggests, experts define numerical features using transaction data which are the base for classifier construction [43], [45]. Some attempts utilize only transaction frequency data [22].…”
Section: Leveraging Transactions Data For Incident Detection -Problem...mentioning
confidence: 99%