2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3189636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Frequency-Domain Location Method for Defects in Cables Based on Power Spectral Density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17], characteristic time-domain waveform recovery technology is proposed based on the frequency-domain reflection method to achieve calculation of the characteristic time-domain waveform recovery, and then the impedance change at the cable impedance mismatch point is determined to identify the fault type. Although this method can identify the impedance changes in short cables well because the test frequency is affected by the actual test equipment and cable length, effective test frequency band data account for a relatively small proportion of the total, resulting in the distortion of the recovery waveform in the feature time domain and making it difficult to judge its polarity [18]. The time-frequency-domain reflectometry (TFDR) method extracts the advantages of FDR and TDR in defect detection and has been widely used in defect detection in power cables [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17], characteristic time-domain waveform recovery technology is proposed based on the frequency-domain reflection method to achieve calculation of the characteristic time-domain waveform recovery, and then the impedance change at the cable impedance mismatch point is determined to identify the fault type. Although this method can identify the impedance changes in short cables well because the test frequency is affected by the actual test equipment and cable length, effective test frequency band data account for a relatively small proportion of the total, resulting in the distortion of the recovery waveform in the feature time domain and making it difficult to judge its polarity [18]. The time-frequency-domain reflectometry (TFDR) method extracts the advantages of FDR and TDR in defect detection and has been widely used in defect detection in power cables [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDR method uses a swept sinusoidal signal as the incident signal of the cable and determines whether a local defect occurs in the cable based on the distortion characteristics of the reflected signal spectrum of the cable. In [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], based on the FDR method, swept−frequency signals were used to diagnose cable defects, and the method was more accurate in localization because the signal contained more high−frequency energy, but it failed to identify different types of cable faults. Meanwhile, single domain analysis faces difficulties in diagnosing cable faults and defects, due to the resolution limitation and weak anti−interference capability of reflected signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%