2018 IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies: Wireless Power Transfer (Wow) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wow.2018.8450907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Frequency-Sweep Based Load Monitoring Method for Weakly-Coupled Series-Series Compensated Wireless Power Transfer Systems

Abstract: In this paper, a frequency-sweep based load monitoring method is proposed for weakly-coupled series-series (SS) compensated wireless power transfer (WPT) systems. By only measuring the input voltage and current of the transmitter coil, the proposed monitoring method can estimate the load resistance without any feedback signals from the receiver even for mid-range applications with very small coupling coefficients. Compared to the existing monitoring methods for short-range applications, the proposed monitoring… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 shows the comparative curves of the relative errors among the proposed monitoring strategy and the existing monitoring strategies when the ESR of the transmitter coil deviates about ±2%, ±4% and ±6% while the ESR of the receiver coil remains unchanged. It can be seen that the relative errors of the proposed monitoring strategy are much less than those of the monitoring strategy in [18] and [20] when the ESR of the transmitter coil deviates from the nominal value. The discrepancy of the relative errors becomes larger as the deviation increases.…”
Section: B Comparisons Among the Proposed Monitoring Strategy And The...mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…24 shows the comparative curves of the relative errors among the proposed monitoring strategy and the existing monitoring strategies when the ESR of the transmitter coil deviates about ±2%, ±4% and ±6% while the ESR of the receiver coil remains unchanged. It can be seen that the relative errors of the proposed monitoring strategy are much less than those of the monitoring strategy in [18] and [20] when the ESR of the transmitter coil deviates from the nominal value. The discrepancy of the relative errors becomes larger as the deviation increases.…”
Section: B Comparisons Among the Proposed Monitoring Strategy And The...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The coupling coefficients of the WPT systems with the resonators-I, resonators-II and resonators-III are also monitored by the existing monitoring strategies in [18], [20] and [21], respectively. For the monitoring strategy in [20], the equivalent load resistance is primarily estimated. Then, the coupling coefficient is further monitored at the resonant frequency using…”
Section: B Comparisons Among the Proposed Monitoring Strategy And The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Choosing the most convenient shape of the transforming module is defined with a number of factors such as the air gap between the separated windings; harmonic effects; Skin depth losses; eddy current losses; size limitation; displacement insensitivity; weight of the magnetic core; and sensitivity to the misalignment between the separated windings In this transforming structure, the air gap is taken into consideration because of its influence on the leakage inductance and mutual coupling, since a large air gap causes a large leakage inductance and a low mutual coupling, which in consequence implies a large magnetizing current. The SS-CCT of WPT system has been proposed in many papers to estimate the load resistance without feedback [Yang et al, 2018], to improve the efficiency with low costs [Tritschler et al, 2015] or by using a frequency-gap model, or to determine the switching frequency [Gao et al, 2017], but in this paper we proposed to improve the efficiency by changing the resonance frequency, optimizing the air gap, and fixing the Resistive load.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%