2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00481-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fresh look at the influence of gravity on the quantum Hall effect

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the correction term in Equation ( 24) is indeed smaller than GMm/ρ 0 , which, as we already argued below Equation ( 16), is nothing but a small perturbation compared to the Landau energy represented by the first term. The same remark is also valid for the general splitting formula (23). In the latter, the smallness of the correction term compared to the first is less transparent but can, nevertheless, still be inferred from the less trivial expressions (A10) and (A17) of M n and P n , respectively.…”
Section: Using Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the correction term in Equation ( 24) is indeed smaller than GMm/ρ 0 , which, as we already argued below Equation ( 16), is nothing but a small perturbation compared to the Landau energy represented by the first term. The same remark is also valid for the general splitting formula (23). In the latter, the smallness of the correction term compared to the first is less transparent but can, nevertheless, still be inferred from the less trivial expressions (A10) and (A17) of M n and P n , respectively.…”
Section: Using Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Indeed, around the poles of the star the cylindrical coordinate ρ is such that ρ = r sin θ r. The results obtained in Section 3.1 can then easily be adapted to such a case (as done in Ref. [23] for the inside of a sphere) by expanding here, instead, the non-relativistic Newtonian potential around the poles of the star into that of a simple harmonic oscillator. Denoting now the radius of the star by R, we have at the poles, r = R 2 + ρ 2 , with ρ R. Therefore, we have, up to a constant, −GM/r ∼ 1 2 GMρ 2 /R 3 .…”
Section: With a Power-law Deviationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations