1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4405(83)90015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fresh look at the retention-promotion controversy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bock's (1977) review of studies concluded that grade repetition is not an effective device to ensure greater mastery of elementary school subject matter. Rose et al (1983) also come to a similar conclusion. The consequence of grade repetition without appropriate courses of action is that retention leaves the struggling learners who are already lagging behind their same-age peers even further and further behind.…”
Section: Opportunity To Learnsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bock's (1977) review of studies concluded that grade repetition is not an effective device to ensure greater mastery of elementary school subject matter. Rose et al (1983) also come to a similar conclusion. The consequence of grade repetition without appropriate courses of action is that retention leaves the struggling learners who are already lagging behind their same-age peers even further and further behind.…”
Section: Opportunity To Learnsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Grade repetition/retention, in the eyes of the struggling learners, is often a sign of academic failure, and this perception has deleterious effects on their cognitive and affective development (Holmes 1989;McCoy and Reynolds 1999;Meisels and Liaw 1993;Rose et al 1983). From the self-regulatory learning perspective (Pintrich and De Groot 1990;Pintrich 2004), grade repetition requires the struggling learners academic resiliency so as to circumvent the adversities ahead of them, and a number of cognitive and emotional traits which are central to the functioning of the brain manifested during learning, such as self-efficacy, self-concept, motivation, and anxiety, are affected (Anderson et al 2005;Finlayson 1977;Goodlad 1954;Pajares 1996;Pajares and Schunk 2001;Pintrich 2003a, b;White and Lee 1973;Wigfield et al 2012;Wu et al 2010).…”
Section: Student Self-regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walters and Borgers (1995) emphasized that educational professionals "must be cognizant of these trends if they are to be effective advocates in helping all children to develop to the best of their potential" (p. 308). Similarly, others have recommended that school psychologists take an active role in the districtwide promotion policy-making process as well as identifying and evaluating alternatives to retention (Rose, Medway, Cantrell, & Marus, 1983). Since school psychologists serve as consultants to teachers and parents, it is important that they disseminate the most current research findings on retention and outline the potential repercussions of a retention decision in addition to identifying possible alternatives.…”
Section: Perspectives Of Educational Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The review of the literature by Jimerson, Carlson, Rotert, Egeland, and Sroufe (1997) concluded that teacher recommendations, classroom performance, social and/or emotional functioning, and performance on standardized assessments often influenced retention decisions. Teacher recommendations appeared to be a key variable in determining which children are recommended for retention (Rose, Medway, Cantrell, & Marus, 1983;Sandoval, 1984;Tanner & Galis, 1997); however, building administrators historically made the final decision (Ellwein & Glass, 1989;Rose et al). Less is known about current grade retention decision-making practices.…”
Section: Grade Retention Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 97%