2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1587-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A full saturated linkage map of Picea abies including AFLP, SSR, ESTP, 5S rDNA and morphological markers

Abstract: Based on an F(1) progeny of 73 individuals, two parental maps were constructed according to the double pseudo-test cross strategy. The paternal map contained 16 linkage groups for a total genetic length of 1,792 cM. The maternal map covered 1,920 cM, and consisted of 12 linkage groups. These parental maps were then integrated using 66 intercross markers. The resulting consensus map covered 2,035 cM and included 755 markers (661 AFLPs, 74 SSRs, 18 ESTPs, the 5S rDNA and the early cone formation trait) on 12 lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This in turn can be due to chance or to differences in the heterozygosity levels of the two trees. Colinearity is generally verified between the map in [1] and the inclusive map presented here [1], thus supporting map order and chromosome consistency for codominant markers. Since a subset of SSR markers is also shared between the present map and the one by [37], it was possible to check this further pair of maps for consistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This in turn can be due to chance or to differences in the heterozygosity levels of the two trees. Colinearity is generally verified between the map in [1] and the inclusive map presented here [1], thus supporting map order and chromosome consistency for codominant markers. Since a subset of SSR markers is also shared between the present map and the one by [37], it was possible to check this further pair of maps for consistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Maps of species belonging to the genus Picea [4,20,37] typically do not show the expected number of linkage groups, corresponding to the haploid chromosome number (n =12), despite the fact that some [37] included a number of markers comparable with those mapped in Pinus species saturated maps [12,15,43], for which 12 linkage groups were identified (an exception is the map of [1], which is based on a different mapping strategy than the others). This is perhaps due to incomplete genome coverage that may be caused by nonrandom genomic distribution of marker types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, SSR markers may be very useful for the integration of the parental maps (Achere et al 2004). In the present study, two kinds of SSR markers, genomic SSR and cDNA-SSR, were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linkage maps with comparable or greater marker densities are available for only a few additional conifers-Cryptomeria japonica D. Don (Tani et al 2003), Picea abies (L.) Karst. (Acheré et al 2004), Pinus pinaster Ait. (Ritter et al 2002), and Pinus sylvestris L. (Komulainen et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%