2022
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202200536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fully 3D‐Printed Tortoise‐Inspired Soft Robot with Terrains‐Adaptive and Amphibious Landing Capabilities

Abstract: Terrain adaptation and amphibious landing pose the greatest challenges for soft amphibious robots. Based on the principles of tortoises, this paper presents a fully 3D‐printed soft amphibious robot with four pneumatic bionic legs that are capable of bending in three dimensions. The gaits of the robot are described in six different ways and a dynamic model is developed for its control. In addition to linear motion (0.97 BL s−1) and turning (25.4° s−1) on rigid terrain, the robot can also maneuver on various sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This robot exhibits superior performance on relative motion speed compared with other typical amphibious robots. [2,10,12,14,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] In particular, the relative terrestrial speed reaches to ≈10.9 BL s -1 , which shows the significant superiority of this design. The relative aquatic speed is ≈2.3 BL s -1 , which is not that fast as the terrestrial speed, but still better than most amphibious robots.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This robot exhibits superior performance on relative motion speed compared with other typical amphibious robots. [2,10,12,14,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] In particular, the relative terrestrial speed reaches to ≈10.9 BL s -1 , which shows the significant superiority of this design. The relative aquatic speed is ≈2.3 BL s -1 , which is not that fast as the terrestrial speed, but still better than most amphibious robots.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of soft robots can be divided into two categories: open-loop control (Figure 7a) and closed-loop control. For example, the FEM [10,80,115,269,270] is one of the most popular model-based open-loop control strategies; it represents soft robot (continuum with infinite DOF) as discrete elements; due to the long computation time, FEM is normally used for verification or prediction and has been used for the reverse design of robot structures.…”
Section: Sensing and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And as long as they are able to operate in in-water environments, they are considered underwater soft robots. Therefore, amphibious soft robots [8][9][10][11] are also considered as underwater soft robots. Soft robots with superior deformability, environmental adaptability, and simple drive control are well suited for application in underwater environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several soft robot designs inspired by biologies, such as the Eelworm robot that can crawl and swim on land [6], and soft robotic snakes that are capable of accessing tight spaces where legged robots cannot [7]. However, legged robots have an advantage in navigating constrained or uneven terrain due to their ability to select contact points with their legs and utilize a variety of efficient gait patterns for different terrains, such as fast limb movements during the swing phase [8]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%