2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2022.3142321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fully Automated Multimodal MRI-Based Multi-Task Learning for Glioma Segmentation and IDH Genotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ken’s study [ 15 ], T2 image-based external testing achieved AUC = 0.73 and ACC = 67.3%, which was inferior to our results. Besides the CNN-based studies, only one study introduced the transformer to the IDH genotyping [ 32 ] without external testing, achieving an internal TCIA test of AUC = 91.04% and ACC = 90%, which was lower than our internal test results. Our Swin Transformer network with bounding box inputs showed great potential in IDH mutation prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ken’s study [ 15 ], T2 image-based external testing achieved AUC = 0.73 and ACC = 67.3%, which was inferior to our results. Besides the CNN-based studies, only one study introduced the transformer to the IDH genotyping [ 32 ] without external testing, achieving an internal TCIA test of AUC = 91.04% and ACC = 90%, which was lower than our internal test results. Our Swin Transformer network with bounding box inputs showed great potential in IDH mutation prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, new DL architectures, such as Transformer, have been seldom introduced to perform the IDH prediction. Transformer, a novel neural architecture whose empirical performance significantly outperforms the conventional CNNs, can effectively capture long-range contextual relations between image pixels and approach to be a state-of-the-art network for medical image representation [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Until now, only one study has applied this framework to IDH mutation status prediction using the TCIA dataset [ 32 ], and more research needs to be performed to demonstrate its generalization and compassion to CNNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the heterogeneity of glioma, several AI algorithm application tools have been used. In particular, combining imaging techniques (i.e., CT, MRI, PET-CT) with metabolic markers and proteome data has been shown to yield useful information for clinical applications [ 69 ]. Current models predict overall survival, progression-free survival, and molecular subtypes of high-grade glioma as well as genetic alterations.…”
Section: Clinical and Management Features Of Significance In Gliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has used transcriptomic data to develop prognostic models for GBM patients [ 75 ]. Machine learning prognostic models using a combination of imaging patterns, clinical features, molecular markers, and radiomic data have shown promising results [ 69 , 95 , 96 ]. The rational implementation of AI algorithms—especially in areas such as imaging where data are already generated as part of the standard of care, as is the case with MRI of the brain for glioma patients—are crucial, since this forms the “floor” or base from which diagnosis and management originate in glioma and are already built into the cost of care ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Optimizing Cost-benefit In Glioma To Advance Patient Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, some recent studies [6,16,27] have been presented to address the aforementioned issue via joint representation learning from multi-modalities. They directly align the feature representation of corresponding pixels from different modalities during the training phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%