Volume 5A: 40th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1115/detc2016-59247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fully Compliant Force Balanced Oscillator

Abstract: Usage of compliant micro mechanical oscillators has increased in recent years, due to their reliable performance despite the growing demand for miniaturization. However, ambient vibrations affect the momentum of the oscillator, causing inaccuracy, malfunction or even failure of these devices. herefore, this paper presents a compliant force balanced mechanism comprising at least a prismatic joint, thereby creating the opportunity for usage of prismatic oscillators in translational accelerating environments. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of these techniques was demonstrated on watch-scale silicon prototypes, which, due to the numerous other advantages in comparison to the traditional balance-hairspring oscillator [4][5][6], paves the way to their becoming the new standard in mechanical watchmaking. The two types of flexure-pivot oscillator architectures presented here correspond to the main categories observed in commercial and patented prototypes, namely, exhibiting either an axis of symmetry like the co-RCC [2,[29][30][31][32] or a ternary rotational symmetry like the TRIVOT [11,[33][34][35]. Therefore, it can be assumed that the design approaches presented here apply to these architectures and provide a way of compensating gravity effects in numerous flexure-pivot oscillators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of these techniques was demonstrated on watch-scale silicon prototypes, which, due to the numerous other advantages in comparison to the traditional balance-hairspring oscillator [4][5][6], paves the way to their becoming the new standard in mechanical watchmaking. The two types of flexure-pivot oscillator architectures presented here correspond to the main categories observed in commercial and patented prototypes, namely, exhibiting either an axis of symmetry like the co-RCC [2,[29][30][31][32] or a ternary rotational symmetry like the TRIVOT [11,[33][34][35]. Therefore, it can be assumed that the design approaches presented here apply to these architectures and provide a way of compensating gravity effects in numerous flexure-pivot oscillators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive balancing is considered to be achieved either (1) when the springs, magnets, masses, inertia, etc. of a mechanism are added or redistributed [3][4][5] or (2) when the initial mechanism kinematics is complexified (e.g., by adding new links to make it symmetric) as long as the initial number of DoF of the mechanism remains unchanged [6][7][8]. On the other hand, active balancing, although not the focus of this article, is considered to be achieved (1) when separate active units are used to actively cancel shaking forces and moments exported to the frame of the mechanism [9,10], or (2) when the trajectory of the mechanism is planned to follow a reactionless path [11,12].…”
Section: Literature Review Of Mechanism Balancing Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. There also exists other designs of flexure pivot oscillators which do not discuss isochronism [17].…”
Section: Isochronismmentioning
confidence: 99%