2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fully implicit combined field scheme for freely vibrating square cylinders with sharp and rounded corners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the coupled fluid-rigid body simulations have been performed using the method proposed in Jaiman et al (2015). For the sake of completeness, the methodology is briefly discussed in this section.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the coupled fluid-rigid body simulations have been performed using the method proposed in Jaiman et al (2015). For the sake of completeness, the methodology is briefly discussed in this section.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fullycoupled finite-element formulation and implementation are discussed in detail in Jaiman et al (2015). The kinematic compatibility at the interface is achieved by construction, which leads to a reduction in the size of the linear system solved per nonlinear iteration.…”
Section: Semi-discrete Petrov-galerkin Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling scheme relies on a dynamic interface force sequence parameter to stabilize the coupled fluid-structure dynamics with strong inertial effects of incompressible flow on immersed solid bodies. The temporal discretizations of both the fluid and structural equations are formulated in the variational generalized-α framework and the systems of linear equations are solved via the Generalized Minimal Residual (GMRES) solver (Jaiman et al 2015(Jaiman et al , 2016b. The validation results of the two-and three-dimensional simulations are reported in Liu & Jaiman (2016), Mysa et al (2016) and Li et al (2016).…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A monolithic approach can achieve good numerical stability for the aeroelastic problem with strong added mass effect, which assembles the fluid and structural equations into a single block then solves the coupled equations in a unified manner. However, it is difficult to take a full advantage of the existing stable and advanced fluid and struc-tural solvers, which restricts the scalability and flexibility of an aeroelastic framework [20,23,24]. Considering the drawbacks of a monolithic scheme, a partitioned approach is developed to employ the existing suitable fluid and structural solvers to solve the complex and generic aeroelastic problem.…”
Section: Aspects Of Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%