2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0096-3003(02)00091-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fully implicit finite-difference scheme for two-dimensional Burgers’ equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
117
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For problem 1, we have taken a 20 × 20 grid with time step t = 0.0001 and Re = 100. The computed and exact values of u and v are shown in Tables I and II along with the results given in Bahadir 9 at some typical grid point (TGP). The tabulated results show that the proposed scheme produces better result than Bahadir.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For problem 1, we have taken a 20 × 20 grid with time step t = 0.0001 and Re = 100. The computed and exact values of u and v are shown in Tables I and II along with the results given in Bahadir 9 at some typical grid point (TGP). The tabulated results show that the proposed scheme produces better result than Bahadir.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For problem 2, computations are done with parameter values Re = 50, 100, and 20 × 20 grid, with the time step t = 0.0001 at time t = 0.625 in order to compare computed results with those given by Jain and Holla 5 and Bahadir. 9 Tables V and VI show comparisons of numerical solutions obtained using the proposed scheme at t = 0.625, with the methods of Jain and Holla 5 and Bahadir. 9 From these Tables, it can be seen that numerical results obtained by using the proposed Exponential method are in good agreement with Jain and Holla 5 and Bahadir.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, one may refer to the approaches based on the finite difference method ( [2,12,16,18,20,23,27]), Galerkin method ( [11,17,33]), finite element method ( [1,8,10,19,24,28]), spectral method ( [4,6,26]) and cubic spline and sinc-function methods ( [1,24,31,32] etc. Most of the mentioned numerical approaches are using various computational techniques in spatial discretizations to get more accurate approximations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%