2017
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.oa-2016-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fully Implicit Finite Volume Lattice Boltzmann Method for Turbulent Flows

Abstract: Almost all schemes existed in the literature to solve the Lattice Boltzmann Equation like stream & collide, finite difference, finite element, finite volume schemes are explicit. However, it is known fact that implicit methods utilizes better stability and faster convergence compared to the explicit methods. In this paper, a method named herein as Implicit Finite Volume Lattice Boltzmann Method (IFVLBM) for incompressible laminar and turbulent flows is proposed and it is applied to some 2D benchmark test c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they require recalculations of the collision for each refinement level. To avoid this, a second approach is used, which uncouples the time and space increments and uses conventional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) methods such as the finitevolume method (FVM) [17][18][19][20][21][22], the finite-difference method (FDM) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the finiteelement method (FEM) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41], or the meshless method [42][43][44][45]. This approach suffers from numerical diffusion, which leads to dissipation error in proportion to the mesh distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they require recalculations of the collision for each refinement level. To avoid this, a second approach is used, which uncouples the time and space increments and uses conventional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) methods such as the finitevolume method (FVM) [17][18][19][20][21][22], the finite-difference method (FDM) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the finiteelement method (FEM) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41], or the meshless method [42][43][44][45]. This approach suffers from numerical diffusion, which leads to dissipation error in proportion to the mesh distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%