2018
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav2623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A functional proteomics platform to reveal the sequence determinants of lysine methyltransferase substrate selectivity

Abstract: Mapping lysine methyltransferase substrate selectivity reveals gaps in the proteome-wide curation of lysine methylomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our studies also included an advance of the previously performed OPAL (oriented peptide array library) technology. In this work, we used more quantitative flashplate scintillation counting of PRMT activity towards immobilized degenerate peptides (Cornett et al 2018). As these peptides contained a fixed central arginine substrate along with a single other fixed amino acid position (excluding Cysteine), we were able to derive in vitro substrate preferences for the three most abundant enzymes: PRMT1, PRMT4/CARM1, and PRMT5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our studies also included an advance of the previously performed OPAL (oriented peptide array library) technology. In this work, we used more quantitative flashplate scintillation counting of PRMT activity towards immobilized degenerate peptides (Cornett et al 2018). As these peptides contained a fixed central arginine substrate along with a single other fixed amino acid position (excluding Cysteine), we were able to derive in vitro substrate preferences for the three most abundant enzymes: PRMT1, PRMT4/CARM1, and PRMT5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then, in the presence of 3 H-SAM, incubated recombinant human PRMT1, human PRMT4 (CARM1), C. elegans PRMT5, and Xenopus laevis PRMT5-MEP50 complex on the OPAL arrays. Using scintillation counting on the OPAL peptides, we determined relative methyltransferase activity and for each enzyme plotted the results as a heatmap (Figure 2b-e) (Cornett et al 2018). To determine consensus motifs, we generated Weblogo probability plots (Figure 2f-i, bottom panels).…”
Section: Substrate Specificity Of Prmtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated histone mark MPP8 chromo H3K9me2/3 (Kokura et al, 2010) L3MBTL1 3xMBT H1bK26me1/2 (Trojer et al, 2007) H4K20me1/2 (Min et al, 2007) DIDO1 PHD H3K4me3 (Gatchalian et al, 2016) PHF20 Tudor H3K4me2 (Klein et al, 2016) H4K20me2 (Klein et al, 2016) L3MBTL3 3xMBT Many Kme2 (Nady et al, 2012) 53BP1 TTD H4K20me1/2 (Botuyan et al, 2006;Hartlerode et al, 2012) H3K18me2 (Shanle et al, 2017) H3K36me2 (Tong et al, 2015) PCL1 Tudor H3K36me3 (Cai et al, 2013) CDYL1b chromo H3K9me2/3 (Franz et al, 2009;Escamilla-Del-Arenal et al, 2013) H3K27me3 (Vermeulen et al, 2010) CDYL2 chromo H3K9me3 (Fischle et al, 2008) H3K27me3 (Fischle et al, 2008) (Cornett et al, 2018) to predict where these readers may bind in the proteome ( Figure 1B). For these studies, MPP8 and CDYL2 chromodomains were chosen because aspects of their amino acid binding preferences are reported elsewhere (Li et al, 2011;Barnash et al, 2016), and these data were consistent with Kme-OPL profiles generated with these readers.…”
Section: Protein Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to relate Kme-OPL profiles to the human proteome, we used our previously developed LoB scoring function (Cornett et al, 2018). LoB scoring ranks all lysine centered seven-mers in the proteome from most to least likely to bind to a given reader.…”
Section: Protein Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22] However, antibody based methyl-enrichments have a number of challenges and limitations: (1) they require a large amount of sample and multiple antibodies to cover all methyl forms; (2) they often contain a sequence bias for antigen recognition, thus selectively assaying a portion of the methylome while masking an unknown but likely significant portion of methyl-sites; and (3) by nature these approaches do not enrich the unmodified form of the peptide, hindering quantification of all peptidoforms together and thus impairing the ability to study the relative abundance of PTMs. 23,24 To overcome these limitations and facilitate a comprehensive and technically straightforward quantitative survey of the methylome in biological samples, we leveraged small precursor acquisition window DIA-MS, coupled with careful curation of a combined low pH SCX fractionated and methyl peptide immunoprecipitation enriched peptide library consisting of both unmodified and methylated peptides against which each experimental sample is extracted and compared. In addition to methylation, lysine residues can be modified by various other PTM's, including acetylation and succinylation.…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%