2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A functional scale for spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study

Abstract: We aimed to develop, validate, and evaluate a disease-specific outcome measure for SBMA: the Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy Functional Rating Scale (SBMAFRS). We examined the Japanese version (SBMAFRS-J) in 80 Japanese SBMA subjects to evaluate its validity and reliability. We then assessed this scale longitudinally in 41 additional SBMA subjects. The English version (SBMAFRS-E) was also tested in 15 US subjects. The total score of the SBMAFRS-J was distributed normally without an extreme ceiling or floor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we observed no significant correlations between %PEF and bulbar, upper limb, or respiratory subscores. The lack of correlation between the respiratory domain of SBMAFRS and %PEF or %FVC appears to stem from the fact that most subjects were at relatively early stages of the disease and reported no overt dyspnea on the functional scales [13]. The total scores and subscores of SBMAFRS correlated more strongly with %PEF than %FVC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we observed no significant correlations between %PEF and bulbar, upper limb, or respiratory subscores. The lack of correlation between the respiratory domain of SBMAFRS and %PEF or %FVC appears to stem from the fact that most subjects were at relatively early stages of the disease and reported no overt dyspnea on the functional scales [13]. The total scores and subscores of SBMAFRS correlated more strongly with %PEF than %FVC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBMAFRS is a validated disease-specific functional scale for SBMA that demonstrates a high sensitivity for monitoring disease progression [13]. The validity of the motor functional measurements we used for SBMA is described in the S1 Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,15 The SBMAFRS is a questionnaire-based scale consisting of subscales related to bulbar function upper limb, trunk, lower limb, and breathing. 9,15 The SBMAFRS is a questionnaire-based scale consisting of subscales related to bulbar function upper limb, trunk, lower limb, and breathing.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharyngeal barium residue and times of piecemeal deglutition (multiple repeated swallows) were measured blindly by two independent evaluators as described previously. To evaluate the validity of the measurements, the SBMA functional rating scale (SBMAFRS),18 SWAL‐QOL symptom subscores,19, 20 and Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire–Japanese (SDQ‐J) were used 21, 22. Data were analyzed by intraclass correlation (1, 1) for reproducibility and Spearman's rank correlation for validity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%