2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023ms003674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Functionalized Monte Carlo 3D Radiative Transfer Model: Radiative Effects of Clouds Over Reflecting Surfaces

Abstract: Cloud-radiation interactions are both complicated and central to several fields of the atmospheric sciences ranging from satellite remote sensing to numerical weather and climate prediction. Monte Carlo (MC) methods are unbiased statistical integration methods (Cahalan et al., 2005;Mayer, 2009;Pincus & Evans, 2009) that are able to solve the full radiative transfer (RT) equation for arbitrarily complex 3D fields. They have not been directly used in operational contexts yet because of their potentially substant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resolving 3D radiation more accurately is possible in academic setups, where specific mechanisms can be studied in a controlled manner. For example, Veerman et al (2022) coupled a 3D Monte Carlo ray tracer to a cloud-resolving model to study cumulus, Gristey et al (2022) used a similar technique but in an uncoupled setup to study cumulus with aerosol effects, Villefranque et al (2023) functionalised a ray tracer to study the effect of surface albedo on irradiance in cumulus fields, and Pincus and Evans (2009) demonstrated an alternative to ray tracing altogether. However, even in the best-studied case of boundary-layer shallow cumulus, one can question the realism with which large-eddy simulations (LESs) can resolve such clouds (Romps et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolving 3D radiation more accurately is possible in academic setups, where specific mechanisms can be studied in a controlled manner. For example, Veerman et al (2022) coupled a 3D Monte Carlo ray tracer to a cloud-resolving model to study cumulus, Gristey et al (2022) used a similar technique but in an uncoupled setup to study cumulus with aerosol effects, Villefranque et al (2023) functionalised a ray tracer to study the effect of surface albedo on irradiance in cumulus fields, and Pincus and Evans (2009) demonstrated an alternative to ray tracing altogether. However, even in the best-studied case of boundary-layer shallow cumulus, one can question the realism with which large-eddy simulations (LESs) can resolve such clouds (Romps et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%